Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: The most effective and most often used murder weapon [View all]beevul
(12,194 posts)25. LOL. THATS your gambit?
No you don't destroy my line of reasoning, since you altered my original premise and created a rebuttal to your own faulty reconstruction.
In the above sentence, you accuse me of altering your original premise.
I was referring to the 80 million gun owners in general who, according to your false premise: do not kill or shoot someone 99.9% of the time.
In the very next sentence, you changed MY premise, since when I say 99.9 percent as in my sig, I'm measuring people, not time.
So actually its YOUR false premise, not mine. If that's what you call 'witting', I'm going to classify it as the rhetorical version of you trying to use your face to hurt my fists. Oh please, you're hurting me, stop.
Even if 30,000 gun owners per year for 75 years were to shoot someone, this would amount to over 2 million gun owners out of 80 million, or about 3%, much higher than your 0.1%..
First, you don't just get to factor out new gun ownership, or even assume that its not 10 times higher in number than the number of gun deaths annually. It is. And then some.
Second, you don't just get to count 75 years worth of those who did against 1 year of those who didn't.
Heres your math, genius: 79,970,000 x 75 = 5,997,750,000
Congratulations. You've done the impossible. I expected less than nothing from you in terms of a response, and the bullshit you're piously trying to peddle qualifies as less than less-than-nothing.
Like I said, You talk a big game to the experienced swimmers, from the shallow end of the pool.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Apologies accepted, but you should seek treatment for that case of Markley's Syndrome:
friendly_iconoclast
Feb 2016
#5
Especially a single action sig...you can buy 2 plastic striker junkers for that one sig.
ileus
Feb 2016
#13
No, the gun wackos love to say a gun is just a tool, like a fire extinguisher, which is BS. nt
Logical
Mar 2016
#21
Tool- "a device or implement...used to carry out a particular function"
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2016
#29