Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: The most effective and most often used murder weapon [View all]beevul
(12,194 posts)38. Says you.
There wouldn't be 410 million gun owners in existence after 5 years, which, allowing for maybe 10% deaths & giving up guns, would ridiculously be more than the ~325 million US population.
So what? If, IF your goal is to tally those who did versus those who didn't, that's the applicable math.
I allowed for a total of 100 million gun owners in existence {or gone} after 5 years for calculation purposes, which is far closer to the facts than your ridiculous contention of 410 million.
Its not MY contention, jimmy, its YOURS:
80,000,000 gun owners - 2000 ------ 80,000 shootings & gundeaths (0.1% x gunowners)
81,000,000 ..... " ........ - 2001 ------ 81,000 ..... "
82,000,000 ..... " ........ - 2002 ------ 82,000 ..... "
83,000,000 ..... " ........ - 2003 ------ 83,000 ..... "
84,000,000 ..... " ........ - 2004 ------ 84,000 ..... "
........................................ total = 410,000
81,000,000 ..... " ........ - 2001 ------ 81,000 ..... "
82,000,000 ..... " ........ - 2002 ------ 82,000 ..... "
83,000,000 ..... " ........ - 2003 ------ 83,000 ..... "
84,000,000 ..... " ........ - 2004 ------ 84,000 ..... "
........................................ total = 410,000
You wrote that. You came up with the hypothetical numbers. I just finished your math is all.
You find the shooting/kill percentage of existing plus dead or gone gun owners in America after 5 years, using your 0.1% claim. 410 thousand is 0.41% of 100 million, rough estimate.
That's funny, the calculator says its .1 percent. Your 'rough estimate' is off by a factor of 4.
.. you are now double counting gun owners to make an invalid contention. Ha, double count? quintuple counting.
Nope, I'm just tallying them once. You on the other hand tally up the deaths and injuries but don't bother with the rest.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Apologies accepted, but you should seek treatment for that case of Markley's Syndrome:
friendly_iconoclast
Feb 2016
#5
Especially a single action sig...you can buy 2 plastic striker junkers for that one sig.
ileus
Feb 2016
#13
No, the gun wackos love to say a gun is just a tool, like a fire extinguisher, which is BS. nt
Logical
Mar 2016
#21
Tool- "a device or implement...used to carry out a particular function"
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2016
#29