Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Cruz’s Gun Control Deception [View all]gejohnston
(17,502 posts)44. still not one valid argument
and you failed to
My "talking points" are statements of fact.
You definitely know more about the gun industry than I do, however let me pose a situation to you, when the homicide becomes personal, would you change your position?
No. In fact, I would become less qualified to advocate public policy on guns for that very reason. That said, a kid in fourth grade class saved his and his mother's lives because he had access to a gun. The abusive drunk for a step dad that was in the process of literally beating his mom to death, not so much. Being white, not part of a gang or associate with organized crime, means that I am less likely to be a murder victim in the US than, say, Europe.
Let me ask you a question, do people have the right to defend themselves? Should they have the best means available? Please, don't drag out the discredited Kellermann "study".
Here is another question. If a rampage killer uses a gun, why are there weeks of hand wringing by politicians and pundits but Kill as many people with car, or even more people with a gallon of gas, it is a local story for a day?
I can point to the law that shows where target pistols like the Walther GSP are banned as an "assault weapon". That is not a talking point. A talking point is simply a PR release that anyone can recite without thought. It has nothing to do with the accuracy.
When do you decide to look beyond defending your pro-gun position and reach out beyond to create safer gun ownership for all Americans?
When I hear a valid argument based on facts, evidence, and reason from your side. Like the "ban pitbull" activists, anti pot, and anti gay marriage supporters, all of the arguments are emotional based and are various logical fallacies strung together. An example of where it actually works would help also. I have an open mind, but I'm one of those people who are convinced only by empirical evidence and facts.
Everybody wants to save lives. Great. I showed my solutions to almost of all murders in the US without banning a single gun. BTW, 8K people were murdered with a gun last year out of a total of 11K. 14K died of heroin overdose. That is one quarter of OD deaths in the US. When are we going to ban heroin? It doesn't matter where you are in the world, if you can get coke or heroin, you can get a gun.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
79 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
re: "In 2014, Washington, D.C., reported 15.9 murders for every 100,000 people..."
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Apr 2016
#7
I think they just desperately want to think of themselves as "moderates" on gun control
DonP
Apr 2016
#55
Simple Definition of conjecture : an opinion or idea formed without proof or sufficient evidence
aurelius2112
Apr 2016
#61
"I have come here...with the objective of trying to draw some consensus" I doubt that very much
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2016
#67
OK, which *extant* gun regulation(s) would you be willing to give up, in exchange for others?
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2016
#71
You've pointed out once again the gun controller's fraudulent version of 'reasonableness':
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2016
#73
"Assault weapons" are civilian non-automatics (mostly small caliber), not machineguns.
benEzra
Apr 2016
#50