Gun Control & RKBA

beevul

(12,194 posts)

28. First, this is not a "protected group".

Sat May 28, 2016, 02:04 PM

May 2016

First, this is not a "protected group". Everyone is welcome to post here regardless of stance in this issue.

"does that include parents who teach gun safety, marksmanship, or hunting?" That's so goofy a question it refuses dignification.

Only if one ignores the things anti-gunners have said over the years, is this 'goofy'.

But since you want to get kids involved - all kids get basic fundamental gun safety classes and after twelve gun safety/shooting permits with classes, bring back the single shot .410 and single shot .22 until 16.

I've said many times, that gun safety should be taught in high school. Universally.

You'd have to have 2000 plus hours to set hair in Texas. How about 200 hrs of training and range practice prior to owning a big gun?

Setting hair in Texas isn't a constitutionally protected civil right. Gun ownership, on the other hand, is.

Forget registration. The anti-gunners have already shown how they'd use it, multiple times.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

65 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Can you imagine believing this? [View all] Kang Colby May 2016 OP

Which is why EdwardBernays May 2016 #1

And where in the original posting... theatre goon May 2016 #3

It's simple EdwardBernays May 2016 #4

Yes, very simple. theatre goon May 2016 #5

No EdwardBernays May 2016 #6

Logical...? theatre goon May 2016 #13

Logical? Straw Man May 2016 #34

The problem with that logic EdwardBernays May 2016 #35

C'mon now ... Straw Man May 2016 #38

people would get shot with bows and crossbows, gejohnston May 2016 #39

Where did you get the strange idea that a law would stop a crime? discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2016 #8

Check the OP EdwardBernays May 2016 #11

The fault lies in the assumptions discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2016 #18

Your premise is flawed sarisataka May 2016 #9

No EdwardBernays May 2016 #10

it is called sarcasm, gejohnston May 2016 #40

No? EdwardBernays May 2016 #41

I'm more inclined to think that you wouldn't recognize it. gejohnston May 2016 #42

Absolutely. EdwardBernays May 2016 #48

not a problem beergood May 2016 #47

no it isn't gejohnston May 2016 #12

No EdwardBernays May 2016 #16

not all, gejohnston May 2016 #19

Not even close EdwardBernays May 2016 #36

that has been established in criminology for 130 years, at least. gejohnston May 2016 #37

I do agree that some gunowners are lawless criminals TeddyR May 2016 #15

And theres your problem in a nutshell. beevul May 2016 #17

No, most gun control laws are in a special class known as crap. Kang Colby May 2016 #20

Nonsense EdwardBernays May 2016 #24

Thats a ridiculous assertion. beevul May 2016 #26

it's obviously not. EdwardBernays May 2016 #29

no country has has gun crime like America? gejohnston May 2016 #31

Thats not a standard... beevul May 2016 #43

Whoa dude...is that Piers Morgan? n/t Kang Colby May 2016 #45

Ask Europeans who suffer from almost no gun crime... discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2016 #46

Here's the thing EdwardBernays May 2016 #52

Another ridiculous assertion. beevul May 2016 #57

The moment EdwardBernays May 2016 #59

hand grenades are not illegal gejohnston May 2016 #61

Right. beevul May 2016 #62

says who? gejohnston May 2016 #27

All emotion. No facts. Kang Colby May 2016 #49

If so few are capable of governing themselves how fewer still are capable of governing others? Nuclear Unicorn May 2016 #53

??? EdwardBernays May 2016 #54

You're the one claiming people can't be trusted to govern themselves. Nuclear Unicorn May 2016 #55

You've misunderstood EdwardBernays May 2016 #56

Nobody has misunderstood. beevul May 2016 #58

No EdwardBernays May 2016 #60

Lets get something strait here... beevul May 2016 #63

I also see a daily report of police excesses. What's a unicorn to think now? Nuclear Unicorn May 2016 #65

whats wrong with that? beergood May 2016 #64

One of the dumbest memes of all times. marble falls May 2016 #2

How about this one? sarisataka May 2016 #7

I used to think I should be allowed to own whatever I wanted so long as I kept it to myself ... marble falls May 2016 #21

just a few things gejohnston May 2016 #22

This is the last response - I realy do not belong here, but here it is: marble falls May 2016 #25

First, this is not a "protected group". beevul May 2016 #28

if we didn't have a gang problem, gejohnston May 2016 #30

"This is the last response - I really do not belong here......" pablo_marmol May 2016 #50

The errors and omissions discntnt_irny_srcsm May 2016 #23

Before you start you'all-ing sarisataka May 2016 #32

Thanks for sharing. Kang Colby May 2016 #33

The whole point of control is to hammer on legal gun owners. ileus May 2016 #14

No, i can't. But many do. MariaThinks May 2016 #51