Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Gun Violence Is a Full-Blown National Crisis [View all]beevul
(12,194 posts)69. It makes a reference...
The Second Amendment refers to "a well regulated militia".
It makes a reference, but the militia is NOT what the second amendment is about. Proof of that is contained in the constitution itself, where congress is granted power over the militia. Amendment 2 doesn't say "the right of the militia", it says "the right of the people".
If the Founders had intended that the right to carry be an individual right they would not have needed to reference the militia, which is referenced elsewhere.
That's like...your opinion man.
They could have simply said that all American s have a right to keep and bear arms.
They did just that. They just didn't use wording that you approve of or agree with. How many state constitutions, written in the same era by folks with the same mindset, would you like me to quote?
Justice Scalia was determined to find, or more properly create, an individual right. So he created one by effectively deleting words that contradicted his intent.
Incorrect. Even the dissent is counter to your opinion here.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
113 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It is in some neighborhoods. 68 people were shot Memorial Day weekend in Chicago alone
lostnfound
Jun 2016
#4
Any attempt at "confiscating them all and locking them up" would kill more people...
Lizzie Poppet
Jun 2016
#31
Yep, I like my gunz and I will be keeping them for many years. And then when I'm gone my
Waldorf
Jun 2016
#89
This is nothing more than an argumentum ad populum, with a dash of cultural cringe
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2016
#96
Mainstream where your are (or not), it's *still* argumentum ad popularum
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2016
#107
Dozens of people in one region is not the world, so don't try to pass it off as that...
Marengo
Jun 2016
#98
After Sandy Hook Republicans passed laws that make it easier to have more guns around
Botany
Jun 2016
#6
Inner city Milwaukee keeps electing pro-gun Sheriff who asks constituents to buy guns
HereSince1628
Jun 2016
#8
Crimes done with firearms, as well as all violent crime is at the lowest it's been in decades.
Ikonoklast
Jun 2016
#9
Is that what it's really about? Deaths? Or is it just guns you don't like?
Nuclear Unicorn
Jun 2016
#19
The NYT got those numbers from a subreddit called "Guns Are Cool". They are not actual statistics.
Ikonoklast
Jun 2016
#20
I believe the N Hollywood thugs killed no one. But THEY got dead via rifles... from a gun shop.
Eleanors38
Jun 2016
#67
Interesting perspective, plus there would be the advantage that no controller...
Marengo
Jun 2016
#110
I wish they would take seriously my theory of the turn-around heat-seeking missile...
Eleanors38
Jun 2016
#74
If I said that LYING about our "epidemic of violence" was a full-blown national crisis......
pablo_marmol
Jun 2016
#113