Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Honest question. If gun rights supporters are idiots... [View all]beevul
(12,194 posts)194. Also, keep in mind what that poster is defending.
Then there's the tactics. Gunners tend to belittle and besmirch; "you called it a clip! You're too stupid for me to talk to!"...
What this poster is trying to do here, is defend certain misinformational tactics, and insulate certain talking points from scrutiny:
assault weapon vs assault rifle
"If you want to shoot an assault weapon join the army"
"Weapons that belong on the battlefield"
"Military grade" (I guess we better ban the f-150)
"Gunshow loophole"
and to attack the source instead of addressing the content "Bloomberg had something to do with it so I can call names and ignore the actual commentary".
Translation: "We're cozying up to mayor 1percentstopandfrisk and we'd really appreciate it if you wouldn't bring it up".
And don't forget the flash mobs, one gun safety post gets 5 antagonists piling on. All for one and one for all.
Ahh gun safety. Nevermind that anti-gun types almost never talk about actual gun safety. We aren't supposed to bring that up either.
Beyond that, it translates into "gee, I wish we anti-gun people weren't outnumbered 100 to one, I wonder if I can shut some of the pro-gun folks up by trying to shame them and make it seem otherwise". And lastly, notice the label "antagonists", in spite of the fact that he/she is the one that leaves the protected sanctity of bansalot to post daily anti-gun screeds and google dumps in this group where he knows they are allowed but highly unpopular among regular residents.
Just who is trying to antagonize who here?
THIS is why we can't have any discussion, and why they can not be trusted (though not the only reason).
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
200 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If you honestly aren't cognizant of "any form of serious debate or discussion"
cheapdate
May 2016
#1
Very rarely..gun control supporters usually just result to name calling. That's my take on it. n/t
Kang Colby
May 2016
#2
Then I would suggest you're looking in the wrong places for serious discussion.
cheapdate
May 2016
#3
You're far from the first self-appointed "new DU champion of gun control" we've seen
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2016
#111
"At least I'm looking out for your family's safety..." You merely *claim* that you are looking...
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2016
#80
Thanks for sharing your opinion - you don't like guns - we get it. I hope however,
jonno99
Jun 2016
#61
How many tanks, aircraft, guided missiles, and drones do the Taliban and ISIS/Daesh have?
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2016
#81
A first-world army that hasn't yet defeated the Taliban, after +/- 15 years of trying...
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2016
#109
Yes. Castro fought his revolution with T-34s & MiGs. Couple of cruisers, too.
Eleanors38
Jun 2016
#176
Actually we do. Gun rights supporters that hang out in forums and groups like this one
flamin lib
Jun 2016
#46
As a gun owner yourself, you are ok with arguing for restrictive legislation...
Marengo
Jun 2016
#51
Stop trying to hijack this thread. The OP asked why we don't have productive discussions.
flamin lib
Jun 2016
#63
Because IT IS OFF TOPIC. Typical attempt to launch a red herring and ignore the topic at hand.
flamin lib
Jun 2016
#68
Unless your commentary was off topic, it's spot on and you know it. Why are you so evasive?
Marengo
Jun 2016
#79
I will answer one more time that the OP asked 'why isn't there productive discussion
flamin lib
Jun 2016
#110
No, I refuse to engage you in a personal argument over a red herring. We can keep this going or you
flamin lib
Jun 2016
#113
Right, just as I said earlier, it's obvious you refuse because you can't without damaging...
Marengo
Jun 2016
#116
Oh, too much work to start a thread? Exhausted from typing so much trying to
flamin lib
Jun 2016
#137
You wouldn't be pushing back so hard unless you have realized your integrity is threatened...
Marengo
Jun 2016
#142
Sigh. This is a red herring. If you'd like to add something to the question posed in the OP
flamin lib
Jun 2016
#146
Are you the arbiter of who may and may not post a reply in this thread, and to what?
Marengo
Jun 2016
#143
And what game is that? Pointing out logical fallacies? Not taking bait? Or is it poor form to ask
flamin lib
Jun 2016
#145
Attributing logical fallacies where they don't exist in order to camouflage...
Marengo
Jun 2016
#147
Yes, attempting to take a conversation in an entirely different direction is, by definition,
flamin lib
Jun 2016
#160
I'm not fearful, just insistent that you stop attempting to hijack a thread so
flamin lib
Jun 2016
#163
The argument is clear. You either cannot comprehend it, or cannot respond without...
Marengo
Jun 2016
#166
I have made no premise, only steadfastly refused to engage your red herring. nt
flamin lib
Jun 2016
#169
The strength of you argument should easily be able to banish that red herring...
Marengo
Jun 2016
#172
Those are quotes from posts here on DU? Why haven't you provided links or cites...
Marengo
Jun 2016
#171
Because it would be like providing links to explain why the sky is blue. Everybody else in the
flamin lib
Jun 2016
#174
Not up to your other posts but still not bad, finding a way call me a liar without
flamin lib
Jun 2016
#188
As it wasn't imaginary fingers that typed that post, it would appear that you are either...
Marengo
Jun 2016
#189
Another way of calling me a liar is to to demand I provide links to established gungeon
flamin lib
Jun 2016
#198
I won't call you a liar. However, your claims as to what's been said remain faith-promoting rumor
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2016
#199
There can be no "productive discussions", when you refuse to answer questions asked of you.
beevul
Jun 2016
#103