Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
15. have to correct one thing
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 09:41 PM
Jun 2016

last I checked, they are still available in Canada now as restricted after being unrestricted for decades. There is a movement to move it back to unrestricted because mechanically, that is where the advocates say it belongs. I'm not that very knowledgeable on what the criteria is, so I don't have an opinion.

The AR is semi automatic, not automatic. Automatics are machine guns, which has been prohibited in Canada since 1977 and tightly regulated under one of our federal gun laws.
In my state, the round most commonly used in the AR can't be used for large game hunting because the round isn't powerful enough to humanly kill a deer with one shot. If you have one in the appropriate caliber and a five round magazine, you can legally hunt with it in Wyoming. You will also likely be ridiculed as as being a city slicker or mall ninja.
That is one reason why the bolt actions used by the Canadian Rangers uses a much more powerful round. If you happen to visit a part rural Norway where being armed is required, something like an AR would be very poor choice, unless you want to be the polar bear's last meal.
If the weapon used in Orlando is available in Canada, it would probably be restricted.

On it's face seems to be a reasonable proposal.. virginia mountainman Jun 2016 #1
as it exists, gejohnston Jun 2016 #2
If the appeal process includes... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2016 #3
+1 nt jonno99 Jun 2016 #4
^^^ This. Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #6
Thanks to you Demnorth Jun 2016 #7
Responsible owners. Straw Man Jun 2016 #8
I really appreciate the background and history Demnorth Jun 2016 #14
have to correct one thing gejohnston Jun 2016 #15
Thanks for the info, Demnorth Jun 2016 #21
You're welcome. Straw Man Jun 2016 #18
Thank you for Demnorth Jun 2016 #22
just to add gejohnston Jun 2016 #10
That was a learning experience, Demnorth Jun 2016 #16
You're welcome discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2016 #11
Thanks for the welcome. Demnorth Jun 2016 #19
The whole list thing is a losing idea discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2016 #20
I agree about the media, Demnorth Jun 2016 #24
and thanks back at you discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2016 #25
In the end, I have to come down on the side of "no lists." Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #5
No use of lists to deny firearm purchase rights. Kang Colby Jun 2016 #9
Admirable that Jolly wishes to do something, but S_B_Jackson Jun 2016 #12
THIS!!!!!! Indydem Jun 2016 #17
Sorry for Demnorth Jun 2016 #23
just found this gejohnston Jun 2016 #13
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Just wondering your thoug...»Reply #15