Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Straw Man

(6,775 posts)
18. You're welcome.
Sun Jun 19, 2016, 11:33 PM
Jun 2016
My idea was that an AR style fired multiple times in rapid succession, so I thought it wouldn't be used for hunting, that is if you want to eat the game? (I still don't know if you're able to make single shots with it, googling is just bringing up the high end numbers).

Yes, you can make single shots. Each time you pull the trigger, one round is fired. That's what a semi-auto firearm does. The military full-auto versions, on the other hand, will continue firing round after round for as long as you keep the trigger depressed. (Some military weapons now use "burst fire" instead of full auto, which means the rifle fires three rounds each time the trigger is pressed: sort of "semi-semi-auto.&quot But even military full-auto (or burst fire) versions have a switch that puts them into semi-auto mode. That's why they're often referred to as "select fire" weapons.

I guess this is part of the distinction between the traditional hunters and those preferring the AR style.

Actually, most states have game laws that restrict the number of rounds your magazine can hold when you are hunting. That's why manufacturers offer five-round magazines for people who want to use their AR rifles to hunt. It's not really a question of "hunting style" -- hunters using AR rifles still have the goal of killing their prey with one shot to avoid having to track a wounded animal, for reasons of both aggravation and ethics. The objection of traditional hunters is generally that AR rifles look "too military." They favor the appearance of wood-stocked rifles without pistol grips, the good old "walnut and blue steel" aesthetic.



On it's face seems to be a reasonable proposal.. virginia mountainman Jun 2016 #1
as it exists, gejohnston Jun 2016 #2
If the appeal process includes... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2016 #3
+1 nt jonno99 Jun 2016 #4
^^^ This. Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #6
Thanks to you Demnorth Jun 2016 #7
Responsible owners. Straw Man Jun 2016 #8
I really appreciate the background and history Demnorth Jun 2016 #14
have to correct one thing gejohnston Jun 2016 #15
Thanks for the info, Demnorth Jun 2016 #21
You're welcome. Straw Man Jun 2016 #18
Thank you for Demnorth Jun 2016 #22
just to add gejohnston Jun 2016 #10
That was a learning experience, Demnorth Jun 2016 #16
You're welcome discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2016 #11
Thanks for the welcome. Demnorth Jun 2016 #19
The whole list thing is a losing idea discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2016 #20
I agree about the media, Demnorth Jun 2016 #24
and thanks back at you discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2016 #25
In the end, I have to come down on the side of "no lists." Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #5
No use of lists to deny firearm purchase rights. Kang Colby Jun 2016 #9
Admirable that Jolly wishes to do something, but S_B_Jackson Jun 2016 #12
THIS!!!!!! Indydem Jun 2016 #17
Sorry for Demnorth Jun 2016 #23
just found this gejohnston Jun 2016 #13
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Just wondering your thoug...»Reply #18