Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Demnorth

(68 posts)
19. Thanks for the welcome.
Tue Jun 21, 2016, 06:36 AM
Jun 2016

It seems thoughts of using lists in any bill are not acceptable for a few different reasons, and an appeal process doesn't seem likely to work without tipping off a person being investigated, as well as withholding classified information.

Terminology is interesting, "assault weapon" I assume is a military term. It sounds a lot more harmful than "hunting rifle". While I can see why it might seem that the pro-control leaders criticizing this style of gun are thinking to sweep a very big seller off the market - that may be so - my assumption was that it was in direct response to what happened in Orlando. The timing, that type of gun, its qualities, and the fact it's been used in a few mass shootings. That's the perception up here, though our news reflects the way it's reported in the U.S. It's understood that politicians, everyone, wants to make changes to prevent future tragedies. Hopefully something will be agreed on by both sides, but doesn't seem likely to happen soon. And there are obviously other things to be addressed, that lead a person to do that.

On it's face seems to be a reasonable proposal.. virginia mountainman Jun 2016 #1
as it exists, gejohnston Jun 2016 #2
If the appeal process includes... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2016 #3
+1 nt jonno99 Jun 2016 #4
^^^ This. Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #6
Thanks to you Demnorth Jun 2016 #7
Responsible owners. Straw Man Jun 2016 #8
I really appreciate the background and history Demnorth Jun 2016 #14
have to correct one thing gejohnston Jun 2016 #15
Thanks for the info, Demnorth Jun 2016 #21
You're welcome. Straw Man Jun 2016 #18
Thank you for Demnorth Jun 2016 #22
just to add gejohnston Jun 2016 #10
That was a learning experience, Demnorth Jun 2016 #16
You're welcome discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2016 #11
Thanks for the welcome. Demnorth Jun 2016 #19
The whole list thing is a losing idea discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2016 #20
I agree about the media, Demnorth Jun 2016 #24
and thanks back at you discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2016 #25
In the end, I have to come down on the side of "no lists." Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #5
No use of lists to deny firearm purchase rights. Kang Colby Jun 2016 #9
Admirable that Jolly wishes to do something, but S_B_Jackson Jun 2016 #12
THIS!!!!!! Indydem Jun 2016 #17
Sorry for Demnorth Jun 2016 #23
just found this gejohnston Jun 2016 #13
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Just wondering your thoug...»Reply #19