Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Demnorth

(68 posts)
24. I agree about the media,
Thu Jun 23, 2016, 06:33 AM
Jun 2016

I try to keep that in mind (sensation as a ratings boost) and read between the lines, so to speak, for more fact, less spin. I find the pro-control side gets a lot more air time, not surprised at the moment, as it tends to follow tragic events like this. I see brief response statements from the NRA, and saw a short piece of film of an ex-soldier speaking in defense of the AR. That's pretty much the reporting I've heard for years. I have never seen a gun enthusiast interviewed.

You make some good points. It would have been good to hear more reporting about factors leading a person to commit a crime - mental health issues, and economic status, as you say. The need for good parenting, education, opportunities for youth, good societal support. Keeping guns out of the hands of those "who've demonstrated problematic issues" as you say, is key, but what if those issues are not visible, or no one speaks of them?

I think that's a great idea, to make it possible for people to check with sheriff/police prior to a sale or transfer, but it seems privacy might be an issue there. I don't know enough about background checks (only checked to see what the process entailed in Canada), consensus from the networks was that it was easier than getting a driver's license. I haven't yet looked it up for myself, though.

Thanks for a really interesting post!

On it's face seems to be a reasonable proposal.. virginia mountainman Jun 2016 #1
as it exists, gejohnston Jun 2016 #2
If the appeal process includes... discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2016 #3
+1 nt jonno99 Jun 2016 #4
^^^ This. Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #6
Thanks to you Demnorth Jun 2016 #7
Responsible owners. Straw Man Jun 2016 #8
I really appreciate the background and history Demnorth Jun 2016 #14
have to correct one thing gejohnston Jun 2016 #15
Thanks for the info, Demnorth Jun 2016 #21
You're welcome. Straw Man Jun 2016 #18
Thank you for Demnorth Jun 2016 #22
just to add gejohnston Jun 2016 #10
That was a learning experience, Demnorth Jun 2016 #16
You're welcome discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2016 #11
Thanks for the welcome. Demnorth Jun 2016 #19
The whole list thing is a losing idea discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2016 #20
I agree about the media, Demnorth Jun 2016 #24
and thanks back at you discntnt_irny_srcsm Jun 2016 #25
In the end, I have to come down on the side of "no lists." Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #5
No use of lists to deny firearm purchase rights. Kang Colby Jun 2016 #9
Admirable that Jolly wishes to do something, but S_B_Jackson Jun 2016 #12
THIS!!!!!! Indydem Jun 2016 #17
Sorry for Demnorth Jun 2016 #23
just found this gejohnston Jun 2016 #13
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Just wondering your thoug...»Reply #24