Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Banning guns versus banning alcohol. [View all]beevul
(12,194 posts)44. Its no straw man...
Last edited Thu Jun 23, 2016, 11:46 AM - Edit history (1)
You guys never get tired of that silly straw man, do you?
Its no straw man.
As if anyone ever claimed that guns were conscious actors, capable of doing things on their own.
As if I claimed that someone made that claim. On the other hand, how numerous gun control pushers act and the way they speak about guns, and most importantly how they apportion the blame TO guns and almost never to the person who makes the bad decisions...They frequently refer to guns as if they are not inanimate, and regularly apportion the blame to the gun.
Taking anti-gunners at their word, and holding them to it, is no strawman.
The obvious point, which you are desperate to deflect from, is that the easy availability of guns, especially certain types of guns, makes killing people much easier than it would be with other kinds of weapons.
Deflect from? I admit it that guns make killing people much easier than it would be with other kinds of weapons. I also know that that is one of the reasons the framers chose to give arms special protection.
And no, the fact that some people get killed in other ways is not a counter-argument.
That people have been killed by other things has NEVER been a counterargument against the argument that guns make it easy to kill.
Its an argument that rightfully attacks certain extremists who care only about gun deaths.
We have mass shootings in this country almost every week.
Only by the definitions that have been changed to tally a higher number.
Give us comparable lists of mass stabbings and mass clubbings, and we'll talk.
Repeal amendment 2 and we'll talk.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
heck, you can be a full blown alcoholic and buy alcohol while high on drugs
Press Virginia
Jun 2016
#4
how do you know he didn't drink a fifth of vodka before he walked into that club
Press Virginia
Jun 2016
#19
"you can obtain one if you obtain a FFL (not hard to do) and can afford to pay for the weapon"... or
Ghost in the Machine
Jun 2016
#45
It amazes me that Roberts, Scalia et al. didn't try to roll that one back too. NT
Jerry442
Jun 2016
#6
I'm quite clear on the difference between auto and semi-auto. I also know that...
Jerry442
Jun 2016
#12
I encourage all reading this to research this issue on their own and form their own conclusions.
Jerry442
Jun 2016
#16
Your reply to your interlocutor has a whopping strawman argument at the center of it
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2016
#27
outside of the movies and the ones stolen from cops and national guard armories
gejohnston
Jun 2016
#11
Because full autos were never common in civilian hands, and semiautos work well for civilian use.
benEzra
Jun 2016
#55
The gun prohibitionists have taken a gradualist approach, hence the calls for...
friendly_iconoclast
Jun 2016
#28
"Next time" someone kills over a hundred with fertilizer and fuel oil. I've been told.
Eleanors38
Jun 2016
#51
you know how silly it is to assume coke and heroin dealers go to the local gun store?
gejohnston
Jun 2016
#41