Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

In reply to the discussion: Tipping point. [View all]
 

Human101948

(3,457 posts)
17. You won't like this one as well!
Thu Jun 30, 2016, 03:24 PM
Jun 2016

Now, Stanford law professor John Donohue and his colleagues have added another full decade to the analysis, extending it through 2010, and have concluded that the opposite of Lott and Mustard's original conclusion is true: more guns equal more crime.

"The totality of the evidence based on educated judgments about the best statistical models suggests that right-to-carry laws are associated with substantially higher rates" of aggravated assault, robbery, rape and murder, Donohue said in an interview with the Stanford Report. The evidence suggests that right-to-carry laws are associated with an 8 percent increase in the incidence of aggravated assault, according to Donohue. He says this number is likely a floor, and that some statistical methods show an increase of 33 percent in aggravated assaults involving a firearm after the passage of right-to-carry laws.

These findings build on and strengthen the conclusions of Donohue's earlier research, which only used data through 2006. In addition to having nearly two decades' worth of additional data to work with, Donohue's findings also improve upon Lott and Mustard's research by using a variety of different statistical models, as well as controlling for a number of confounding factors, like the crack epidemic of the early 1990s.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/11/14/more-guns-more-crime-new-research-debunks-a-central-thesis-of-the-gun-rights-movement/

Tipping point. [View all] mog75 Jun 2016 OP
Great! How about liability on the part of any gun owner whose weapon is used to harm others? Human101948 Jun 2016 #1
How about liability for the police and their employers who lose guns that are then used in crimes? Human101948 Jun 2016 #2
There is already liability for using a firearm to illegaly harm others. oneshooter Jun 2016 #3
yeah, yeah, what about the thousands of owners who don't lock up their guns Human101948 Jun 2016 #6
If they are not locked up, and then stolen and used illegaly oneshooter Jun 2016 #20
A car is not a gun... Human101948 Jun 2016 #22
So you are claimimg that a car can not be used to injure or kill? n/t oneshooter Jun 2016 #23
A car is not designed for the sole purpose of killing. A gun is. Katashi_itto Jul 2016 #26
If they are designed for transportation only oneshooter Jul 2016 #28
preconceptions & prejudice >> logic and/or facts n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm Jul 2016 #29
If someone harms another who is not an attacker, I would prefer jail. Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #5
Worst thing about gun-free zones is the advertising. Sheesh. Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #4
The gun free zone is a gun nut myth... Human101948 Jun 2016 #7
Oh yeah, and there was an armed guard at the Orlando shooting... Human101948 Jun 2016 #8
bullshit gejohnston Jun 2016 #9
You protestations are duly noted... Human101948 Jun 2016 #10
yes, but I provided a source not tied to any ideology gejohnston Jun 2016 #12
Your source is a fountain of gun propaganda.. Human101948 Jun 2016 #14
no body armor in that specific case gejohnston Jun 2016 #15
Hard fact, Human: More guns in circulation, murder rates are down. Eleanors38 Jun 2016 #11
Hard fact, if you have a gun in the home you are more likely to die a violent death... Human101948 Jun 2016 #13
critical thinking hint, gejohnston Jun 2016 #16
You won't like this one as well! Human101948 Jun 2016 #17
there are three outlooks in criminology circles gejohnston Jun 2016 #18
Straw colossus. Few in the pro-2A group here buy into Lott's theory. Note CDC findings. Eleanors38 Jul 2016 #32
Here's the thing about correlation ... Straw Man Jul 2016 #33
If you are in a home equipped with electricity, you are more likely to be electrocuted. Eleanors38 Jul 2016 #27
back on topic mog75 Jun 2016 #19
No, not even close DonP Jun 2016 #21
Did you read the article? Kang Colby Jul 2016 #34
Sorry, after two weeks of getting the crap kicked out of me I missed that DonP Jul 2016 #36
You were probably doing a lot of the kicking. Kang Colby Jul 2016 #37
This message was self-deleted by its author pablo_marmol Jul 2016 #25
"harshes my vibe." Heh-Heh. Eleanors38 Jul 2016 #31
No. But the issue will persist as it is culture war by proxy... Eleanors38 Jul 2016 #30
"This is readly assisted by a Democratic Party which has junked any FDR/LBJ pretenses......" pablo_marmol Jul 2016 #38
If I can avoid a "hide," the Party pretty much gave up on a sound ideology for change... Eleanors38 Jul 2016 #41
**Very** well said, E38. pablo_marmol Jul 2016 #43
Yup, it's a tipping point alright... Puha Ekapi Jun 2016 #24
This is clearly the tipping point. Kang Colby Jul 2016 #35
Great idea. Strip citizens of the right to self-defense - pay any consequences. pablo_marmol Jul 2016 #39
I hope you're right...self defense should be #1 priority. ileus Jul 2016 #40
I appreciate this post, as it strongly suggest a larger issue than gun control... Eleanors38 Jul 2016 #42
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Tipping point.»Reply #17