Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Gun rights activists say they won’t comply with California’s new laws [View all]sarisataka
(21,007 posts)59. Do not confuse search with
inspection. They are very different legal terms. Even inspectors cannot simply enter unannounced. Also sending a uniformed police officer will not change anything. Likely any case would be thrown out on 4th Amendment grounds.
Court finds Portsmouths rental inspections unconstitutional
On October 26, 2015
In a recent decision by the District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, the Portsmouth Rental Dwelling Code (RDC) was found to violate the Fourth Amendment insofar as it authorized warrantless administrative rental property inspections.
In 2012, Portsmouth adopted its RDC. The code required rental property owners to apply to the Portsmouth Board of Health for a rental property permit in order to rent their property. To obtain a permit, a Code Enforcement Official would inspect the rental property to determine if the property met the requirements of the code. The city charged fees to issue and renew the annual rental property permits.
Inspections were to be conducted at least once a year and on a minimum of 48 hours notice unless the time period was waived by the tenant. A code enforcement official could also make an inspection in response to a complaint or if the official had a valid reason to believe that a violation of the Code exists. The inspection was limited to the items listed on the citys dwelling inspection checklist which included 80 exterior and interior items. If the inspection revealed non-compliance items, the owner was given a specific time period to correct the items identified.
Although no property owners were cited for violations of the rental inspection program, owners who failed to respond to contacts by the city received a letter ordering the owner to contact the City Health Department to schedule an inspection. The letter stated that an owners failure to do so may result in an order to suspend the rental permits and/or implement procedures for condemnation by the Board of Health and possible issuance of a misdemeanor citation.
http://ohiorealtors.org/2015/10/26/court-finds-portsmouths-rental-inspections-unconstitutional/
On October 26, 2015
In a recent decision by the District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, the Portsmouth Rental Dwelling Code (RDC) was found to violate the Fourth Amendment insofar as it authorized warrantless administrative rental property inspections.
In 2012, Portsmouth adopted its RDC. The code required rental property owners to apply to the Portsmouth Board of Health for a rental property permit in order to rent their property. To obtain a permit, a Code Enforcement Official would inspect the rental property to determine if the property met the requirements of the code. The city charged fees to issue and renew the annual rental property permits.
Inspections were to be conducted at least once a year and on a minimum of 48 hours notice unless the time period was waived by the tenant. A code enforcement official could also make an inspection in response to a complaint or if the official had a valid reason to believe that a violation of the Code exists. The inspection was limited to the items listed on the citys dwelling inspection checklist which included 80 exterior and interior items. If the inspection revealed non-compliance items, the owner was given a specific time period to correct the items identified.
Although no property owners were cited for violations of the rental inspection program, owners who failed to respond to contacts by the city received a letter ordering the owner to contact the City Health Department to schedule an inspection. The letter stated that an owners failure to do so may result in an order to suspend the rental permits and/or implement procedures for condemnation by the Board of Health and possible issuance of a misdemeanor citation.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Gun rights activists say they won’t comply with California’s new laws [View all]
Just reading posts
Jul 2016
OP
Jail? - interesting. I wonder if you would be so respectful of a law restricting abortion -
jonno99
Jul 2016
#47
The fire marshal doesn't search anyone's home unless it went up in air pollution.
gejohnston
Jul 2016
#57
Oh, of course not. They can tap my phone while they're at it. After all, I have nothing to hide.
Just reading posts
Jul 2016
#18
Sales of ammunition and normal capacity magazines will go through the roof in gun shops bordering
Just reading posts
Jul 2016
#42
"Is there any gun regulation, no matter how useless, is too much?" By their own admission, the goal
Just reading posts
Jul 2016
#32
"That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends...
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Jul 2016
#50