They seem to like the "designed" talking point, and repeat it as if it has some relevance.
It doesn't.
Not to mention, that civilian legal non-automatic rifles and handguns, are generally designed specifically to pass stringent standards of non-convertability to automatic fire, and for lawful sale and use in the civilian market in the US.
They argue that cars are "designed" to transport people and goods to and fro, and in doing so, they operate on the pretense that this or its many equivalents, do not exist:
They have to, because otherwise someone might point out that we don't regulate that car any farther than we regulate this car, which is quite obviously not designed for the same purpose:
The anti-gun market of ideas is simply layers of murk on top of layers of murk mixed with lots of muddy water, intended to mislead those who aren't knowledgeable on the topic and are therefore easily swayed.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
= new reply since forum marked as read