Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: "Connecticut Judge Dismisses Newtown Lawsuit Against Gun Maker" [View all]gejohnston
(17,502 posts)29. no.
Safe so you understand now why they should be banned .
statistically, they are close to being the safest items on the market. You mention children. More kids are killed in bicycle accidents than with guns. BTW, scores of studies by criminologists show more people prevent harm with a gun than are harmed by someone armed with one.
They are just too dangerous and there is no incentive for manufacturers to do improve the safety of their product .
Yes there is a huge incentive. Some companies, especially in Europe, have been experimenting for decades. The technology hasn't been there. If there wasn't any incentive, why do companies, and even individual gunsmiths in the flintlock era put safeties on to begin with? Figerprint scanners are on electronic devices, and they work only in ideal situations. Guns are mechanical, and can be used in less than ideal situations. Imagine the Detroit cop in the winter who has to pull his gun in December, but can't defend himself because he is wearing gloves. Same with a German cop. They are dead. The James Bond's custom Walther was cool, I'd buy one if it showed up at a gun store. I thought the Lotus Espirit that turned into a submarine, different James Bond movie, was pretty cool too, but it won't at a dealership near me.
We just need a correct version of an improperly interpreted 2nd amendment ruling
What? Heller interpreted it correctly. Back then, the concept of collective rights did not exist. Also, their brand of liberalism puts the individual above the group or State.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
143 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Why? Because it gives this ONE industry in our country immunity against law suits and
BlueCaliDem
Oct 2016
#27
Bullshit. What's not fair is that arms manufacturers are allowed to kill our kids with impunity
stone space
Oct 2016
#97
I would like to learn more about the "Arms manufacturings killing kids and crying like a victim."
Littlepawkitty
Oct 2016
#116
Even the virulently anti-gun WaPo owns up to a figure of 84 accidental deaths in 2015...
Eleanors38
Oct 2016
#143
The "doubt" about CDC research serves more as a tip-off to the gross slant an article takes...
Eleanors38
Oct 2016
#147
I'm not on trial here, pal. You don't get to do deposition here with me. Awful, huh?
BlueCaliDem
Oct 2016
#48
Unless you've seen all the evidence that Plaintiff planned to introduce, neither you nor I can say
BlueCaliDem
Oct 2016
#75
False. Remington or any other gun seller is subject to product liability actions.
Eleanors38
Oct 2016
#114
Right depends on interpretation. the 2a only applied to a militia if it was needed to secure a free
Ohioblue22
Oct 2016
#100
It is rather clear that the Founders intended everyone to be "the militia"
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Oct 2016
#101
What is it you find funniest about children's bodies being pumped with bullets from an AR-15?
stone space
Oct 2016
#68
Fuck the NRA, fuck the PLCAA, and fuck the NRA's sexual predator candidate.
stone space
Oct 2016
#88
Significant numbers of people disagree with the NRA on their support of sexual assault.
stone space
Oct 2016
#96