Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
Showing Original Post only (View all)Maryland's assault weapons ban upheld by US appeals court [View all]
http://www.chron.com/news/us/article/US-appeals-court-upholds-Maryland-assault-weapons-10948756.phpANNAPOLIS, Md. (AP) Maryland's ban on 45 kinds of assault weapons and its 10-round limit on gun magazines were upheld Tuesday by a federal appeals court in a decision that met with a strongly worded dissent.
In a 10-4 ruling, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia, said the guns banned under Maryland's law aren't protected by the Second Amendment.
"Put simply, we have no power to extend Second Amendment protections to weapons of war," Judge Robert King wrote for the court, adding that the Supreme Court's decision in District of Columbia v. Heller explicitly
Judge William Traxler issued a dissent. By concluding the Second Amendment doesn't even apply, Traxler wrote, the majority "has gone to greater lengths than any other court to eviscerate the constitutionally guaranteed right to keep and bear arms." He also wrote that the court did not apply a strict enough review on the constitutionality of the law.
"For a law-abiding citizen who, for whatever reason, chooses to protect his home with a semi-automatic rifle instead of a semi-automatic handgun, Maryland's law clearly imposes a significant burden on the exercise of the right to arm oneself at home, and it should at least be subject to strict scrutiny review before it is allowed to stand," Traxler wrote.
How many times have you seen a meme crawl across your Facebook feed to the effect of "The Democrats aren't coming for your guns" as part of a long list debunking right wing paranoid claims? If you live in California, or Maryland, or New York the Democrats ARE coming for your guns.
California. Maryland. New York. Nice reliable blue voting states. Even if you are "deplorable or "stupid" it is clear to see that if you vote Democratic you are voting for a party that has an active policy of eroding your right to keep and bear arms. Even if you are not really sure whether Obamacare and the Affordable Care Act are the same thing and are tempted to give the Democrat the benefit of the doubt, there's no doubt in your mind, based on actual demonstrated results, that if you vote for a Democrat you are voting for a party that will make it more difficult to buy firearms, and impossible to buy the ones you want.
This. Shit. Costs. Us. Votes.
Why is it that Liberals will twist themselves into emotional knots defending the right of Nazis to exercise their freedom of speech by parading through a Jewish neighborhood, but lose their shit if one of those same Nazis wants to own a black aluminum and plastic semi automatic rifle? What quality of "Right" does Freedom of Speech or Worship have that the "Right" to Keep and Bear Arms does not possess?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
58 replies, 17969 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I am sure trump would agree. Doing so would give his authoritative forces so much more power.
jmg257
Feb 2017
#7
"Guangzhou is a chemical weapons plant masquerading as a fertilizer plant.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Feb 2017
#19
"Put simply, we have no power to extend Second Amendment protections to weapons of war" WTF??
jmg257
Feb 2017
#6
I'm hugely offended when the 'christian right' (which is neither) pushes for hate against ME
N77VG
Feb 2017
#16
"Why is it that Liberals will twist themselves into emotional knots......."
pablo_marmol
Feb 2017
#22
Your header, at least, was accurate- much of what you posted *was* rubbish
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2017
#35
Still no evidence of these purported "conversion kits"- smells like Trump's 'wiretaps' to me.
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2017
#39
"Reread what I wrote". I did- and the parts you bolded are *also* incorrect:
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2017
#41
Prepare yourself for a verbose word-salad that doesn't really answer your question
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2017
#53
I'd like to see a citation of even one Senate/House "assault weapons ban" bill in the last ten years
benEzra
Mar 2017
#56