Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

friendly_iconoclast

(15,333 posts)
35. Your header, at least, was accurate- much of what you posted *was* rubbish
Wed Mar 1, 2017, 06:28 PM
Mar 2017
firearms which in good part morphed from rifles with automatic capabilities many of which can be backfitted to full automatic with common tools or conversion kits.


These 'conversion kits' are The Controllers version of Wayne LaPierre's 'professional protestors':

https://www.salon.com/2017/02/28/the-nras-new-gun-sales-pitch-america-is-a-war-zone-and-the-violent-left-is-coming-for-you/

“The truth is, the far left — they’ve turned protesting into what seems like a full-time profession,” said LaPierre. “Seriously, you would think that for $1,500 a week, they would at least know what they are protesting,” he added, referencing the current right-wing hypothesis that anti-Trump protesters can only be paid provocateurs.


IOW, repeated nonsense presented without evidence-but I am willing to give you the
benefit of the doubt, James: Just obtain one and present evidence of it...

Even these are not to be banned in other states, nor confiscated, just controlled



Yeaaah, about that:

http://law.justia.com/codes/california/2015/code-pen/part-6/title-4/division-10/chapter-2/article-3/section-30720

http://codes.findlaw.com/ca/penal-code/pen-sect-30720.html


(a) Any person, firm, company, or corporation that is in possession of an SKS rifle shall do one of the following on or before January 1, 2000:

(1) Relinquish the SKS rifle to the Department of Justice pursuant to subdivision (h) of former Section 12281.

(2) Relinquish the SKS rifle to a law enforcement agency pursuant to former Section 12288, as added by Section 3 of Chapter 19 of the Statutes of 1989.

(3) Dispose of the SKS rifle as permitted by former Section 12285, as it read in Section 20 of Chapter 23 of the Statutes of 1994.

(b) Any person who has obtained title to an SKS rifle by bequest or intestate succession shall be required to comply with paragraph (1) or (2) of subdivision (a) unless that person otherwise complies with paragraph (1) of subdivision (b) of former Section 12285, as it read in Section 20 of Chapter 23 of the Statutes of 1994, or as subsequently amended.












Still law in California, James...



States have a right to decide for themselves which gun control policies work best for their own state, and not have to prostrate themselves to specious sanctimonious gun lobby arguments like what you proffer above,
If you don't like the gun laws in california or new york or md or hawaii, move


How about 'marriage control' Does local interpretation of the Second Amendment apply to the Fourteenth?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141716858

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141716763

And all guns are weapons of war so this bans all guns scscholar Feb 2017 #1
Silly me discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2017 #3
I do not agree with what you say, Sir, needledriver Feb 2017 #4
But if the Second Amendment is about the militia, sarisataka Feb 2017 #5
Yes. Wasn't that the gov'ts case in Miller? yagotme Feb 2017 #9
I am sure trump would agree. Doing so would give his authoritative forces so much more power. jmg257 Feb 2017 #7
It's astonishing that so many Controllers have yet to figure out...... pablo_marmol Feb 2017 #11
I rather think it was written AGAINST that sort of menace n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2017 #15
I think that you think that he thought you would think that. yagotme Feb 2017 #18
"Guangzhou is a chemical weapons plant masquerading as a fertilizer plant. discntnt_irny_srcsm Feb 2017 #19
Thank you. I think. pablo_marmol Feb 2017 #20
Of course better way of stating the point would have been....... pablo_marmol Feb 2017 #21
Yeah, I hate it when I type something, yagotme Feb 2017 #23
Agree. MarvinGardens Feb 2017 #2
"Put simply, we have no power to extend Second Amendment protections to weapons of war" WTF?? jmg257 Feb 2017 #6
How about these weapons of war? benEzra Mar 2017 #44
What's next, a ban on "assault speech"? N77VG Feb 2017 #8
It's called "hate" speech. yagotme Feb 2017 #10
I'm hugely offended when the 'christian right' (which is neither) pushes for hate against ME N77VG Feb 2017 #16
Yes, it's human nature to want to shut someone down yagotme Feb 2017 #17
I got yer "assault weapon" right here. pablo_marmol Feb 2017 #12
My SKS will pass too. Hangingon Feb 2017 #13
As will my M1 Garands oneshooter Feb 2017 #14
thats not a battle rifle wincest Feb 2017 #25
You might want to ask oneshooter Mar 2017 #43
my apoligies wincest Mar 2017 #51
I was once like you, young and on a budget. oneshooter Mar 2017 #54
"Why is it that Liberals will twist themselves into emotional knots......." pablo_marmol Feb 2017 #22
If a person you talk to keeps spouting obvious lies, yagotme Feb 2017 #24
GOOD!!! 50 Shades Of Blue Feb 2017 #26
may i ask wincest Feb 2017 #27
All guns are assault weapons. I'm totally anti-gun. 50 Shades Of Blue Feb 2017 #28
Then don't own one. benEzra Mar 2017 #45
Good that we're turning over the nation to the GOP to no good end? pablo_marmol Feb 2017 #29
Guns BAD. 50 Shades Of Blue Feb 2017 #30
Well now THERE'S intelligent discourse!! NT pablo_marmol Feb 2017 #31
Wanted you to understand it. 50 Shades Of Blue Feb 2017 #32
More like cowardice. NT pablo_marmol Feb 2017 #33
A common misconception. ManiacJoe Mar 2017 #37
And The Controllers refer to us as knuckle-draggers, while they.......... pablo_marmol Mar 2017 #40
Better round them up, then. yagotme Mar 2017 #49
rubbish jimmy the one Feb 2017 #34
Your header, at least, was accurate- much of what you posted *was* rubbish friendly_iconoclast Mar 2017 #35
Thank you for your reply needledriver Mar 2017 #36
OOOOOOOOOK, lahoma jimmy the one Mar 2017 #38
Still no evidence of these purported "conversion kits"- smells like Trump's 'wiretaps' to me. friendly_iconoclast Mar 2017 #39
"Reread what I wrote". I did- and the parts you bolded are *also* incorrect: friendly_iconoclast Mar 2017 #41
iconic nut jimmy the one Mar 2017 #42
This message was self-deleted by its author friendly_iconoclast Mar 2017 #48
"Off our streets". yagotme Mar 2017 #50
Prepare yourself for a verbose word-salad that doesn't really answer your question friendly_iconoclast Mar 2017 #53
I know. yagotme Mar 2017 #57
Oh, that's rich. So very rich. Straw Man Mar 2017 #55
I'd like to see a citation of even one Senate/House "assault weapons ban" bill in the last ten years benEzra Mar 2017 #56
It would be nice if the gun-ban fundamentalists would acknowledge this fact from time to time... benEzra Mar 2017 #46
I hate to think of instances of the words... discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2017 #47
This message was self-deleted by its author discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2017 #52
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2017 #58
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Maryland's assault weapon...»Reply #35