Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gun Control & RKBA

Showing Original Post only (View all)

TupperHappy

(166 posts)
Thu Mar 9, 2017, 03:39 PM Mar 2017

Sandy Hook families take gun case to state Supreme Court [View all]

http://www.newstimes.com/local/article/Sandy-Hook-families-take-gun-case-to-state-10972962.php

NEWTOWN - The 10 families whose lawsuit against the world’s largest dealer of AR-15 rifles was dismissed last year say their case should be reinstated, arguing that the Sandy Hook massacre was no accident.

“The notion that what happened at Sandy Hook on December 14, 2012, was unimaginable is a lie,” argues the families’ lawyer, Josh Koskoff, in 50-page brief submitted to state Supreme Court this week. “Sandy Hook was simply gratuitous, senseless proof of what was already known: preparation is no match for an AR-15.”

The families’ argument that Remington is liable for the massacre of 26 first-graders and educators by an AR-15-wielding 20-year-old named Adam Lanza was thrown out of Superior Court in October. The judge ruled that Remington is protected by federal law against claims when people misuse firearms
.
The families are sticking to their argument that Remington was liable, saying the company ssly marketed the semi-automatic rifle to civilians.


Rest at the link.

I've said this before, I feel for the families involved, but Remington is not liable for criminal misuse of a firearm. The lawyers would have us believe that, since Bushmasher manufactured the gun, which was then sold to a wholesaler, which was then sold to an FFL, which was then legally sold to the shooter's mother, who was then murdered and the weapon effectively stolen and used in this horrific crime, therefore Remington, who did not even own Bushmaster at the time the gun was manufactured, is now liable for "negligent entrustment". It's utter insanity.

The AR-15 is functionally no different from any other semi-automatic rifle that accepts a detachable magazine. There are literally 10s of millions of this kind of rifle, owned by, again, literally 10s of millions of law-abiding citizens, 99.9%+ of which are never used in a crime. (And yes I do believe I am using the term literally, literally.)

The only point for continuing this lawsuit is for the lawyers to continue to dip their hands into the wallets of the Sandy Hook families. Its a damn shame.
54 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Where do these victims find such incompetent lawyers?!?!?! ManiacJoe Mar 2017 #1
I think that your new friends Dunning and Kruger might be their lawyers n/t discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2017 #2
ar15 white man's toy jimmy the one Mar 2017 #3
How often are AR15s converted to full auto? How many illegally converted AR15s have been seized... Marengo Mar 2017 #4
Probably a few but you'd have ask in France or Australia discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2017 #5
"can" and "can easily" are two very different things. ManiacJoe Mar 2017 #6
Anyone who can convert an AR to full auto... discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2017 #7
Exactly. But those who get their gun knowledge from Hollywood ManiacJoe Mar 2017 #8
if anyone can do it wincest Mar 2017 #15
I've no doubt whatsoever that you actually believe what you wrote there. friendly_iconoclast Mar 2017 #9
iconic amnesia jimmy the one Mar 2017 #12
You're are correct, I *have* seen this bullshit before. Thanks for the link to previous broadcasting friendly_iconoclast Mar 2017 #18
That is not what I claimed. TupperHappy Mar 2017 #10
ar & ak conversions which I do not condone or endorse in any way jimmy the one Mar 2017 #11
It is illegal to convert any semi auto firearm into full auto. The law is there. yagotme Mar 2017 #13
Is it "illegaler"? Beats me. Paladin Mar 2017 #14
Sorry. yagotme Mar 2017 #17
I'm not sure about "illegaler" but it might get you double secret probation. discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2017 #53
Used to be Correctional Officer. yagotme Apr 2017 #54
Correction. Straw Man Mar 2017 #29
no cigar jimmy the one Apr 2017 #38
I don't smoke cigars. Straw Man Apr 2017 #39
you make my case re AR15 jimmy the one Apr 2017 #42
Wrong again, on several counts. Straw Man Apr 2017 #46
Post removed Post removed Apr 2017 #47
Amazed this is still being debated, but let me interject something. TupperHappy Apr 2017 #48
Bravo for the hide inspiring response discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2017 #49
And I thought my response was pretty mild ... Straw Man Apr 2017 #50
neither did I discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2017 #51
"ar15 white man's toy" wincest Mar 2017 #16
proves nothing jimmy the one Mar 2017 #19
"proves nothing" yagotme Mar 2017 #21
gun ownership demographics melm00se Apr 2017 #40
Insufficient data. yagotme Apr 2017 #41
Goodness Blue_Warrior Mar 2017 #20
to agree, or disagree, with oxymoronic hyperbole jimmy the one Mar 2017 #25
If there weren't a correction, it wouldn't be you discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2017 #26
As I suspected you had nothing to back up your assertion. Blue_Warrior Mar 2017 #32
A 500 dollar rifle makes you rich....LOL....now that's RICH. ileus Mar 2017 #23
You have literally no idea what you're talking about. AtheistCrusader Mar 2017 #35
do not employ these illegal conversion kits jimmy the one Apr 2017 #43
So, you know such a hypothetical kit would be instant felony to possess and they aren't readily avai AtheistCrusader Apr 2017 #44
file your taxes soon, but don't file your AR jimmy the one Apr 2017 #45
You're right of course about the lawyers. pablo_marmol Mar 2017 #22
The whole "negligent entrustment" idea... discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2017 #24
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2017 #27
welcome to DU gopiscrap Mar 2017 #28
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2017 #30
You're welcome gopiscrap Mar 2017 #31
I didn't see the post you responded to, its been removed. TupperHappy Mar 2017 #33
of course it was marketed to civilians. It's a civilian rifle. AtheistCrusader Mar 2017 #34
is your avatar wincest Mar 2017 #36
Good catch, yes it is. AtheistCrusader Mar 2017 #37
It will cost the families dearly but the precedence benefit will prove useful... Baconator Apr 2017 #52
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Sandy Hook families take ...»Reply #0