Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
Showing Original Post only (View all)Sandy Hook families take gun case to state Supreme Court [View all]
http://www.newstimes.com/local/article/Sandy-Hook-families-take-gun-case-to-state-10972962.phpNEWTOWN - The 10 families whose lawsuit against the worlds largest dealer of AR-15 rifles was dismissed last year say their case should be reinstated, arguing that the Sandy Hook massacre was no accident.
The notion that what happened at Sandy Hook on December 14, 2012, was unimaginable is a lie, argues the families lawyer, Josh Koskoff, in 50-page brief submitted to state Supreme Court this week. Sandy Hook was simply gratuitous, senseless proof of what was already known: preparation is no match for an AR-15.
The families argument that Remington is liable for the massacre of 26 first-graders and educators by an AR-15-wielding 20-year-old named Adam Lanza was thrown out of Superior Court in October. The judge ruled that Remington is protected by federal law against claims when people misuse firearms
.
The families are sticking to their argument that Remington was liable, saying the company ssly marketed the semi-automatic rifle to civilians.
Rest at the link.
I've said this before, I feel for the families involved, but Remington is not liable for criminal misuse of a firearm. The lawyers would have us believe that, since Bushmasher manufactured the gun, which was then sold to a wholesaler, which was then sold to an FFL, which was then legally sold to the shooter's mother, who was then murdered and the weapon effectively stolen and used in this horrific crime, therefore Remington, who did not even own Bushmaster at the time the gun was manufactured, is now liable for "negligent entrustment". It's utter insanity.
The AR-15 is functionally no different from any other semi-automatic rifle that accepts a detachable magazine. There are literally 10s of millions of this kind of rifle, owned by, again, literally 10s of millions of law-abiding citizens, 99.9%+ of which are never used in a crime. (And yes I do believe I am using the term literally, literally.)
The only point for continuing this lawsuit is for the lawyers to continue to dip their hands into the wallets of the Sandy Hook families. Its a damn shame.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
54 replies, 16941 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I think that your new friends Dunning and Kruger might be their lawyers n/t
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Mar 2017
#2
How often are AR15s converted to full auto? How many illegally converted AR15s have been seized...
Marengo
Mar 2017
#4
I've no doubt whatsoever that you actually believe what you wrote there.
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2017
#9
You're are correct, I *have* seen this bullshit before. Thanks for the link to previous broadcasting
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2017
#18
It is illegal to convert any semi auto firearm into full auto. The law is there.
yagotme
Mar 2017
#13
I'm not sure about "illegaler" but it might get you double secret probation.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Apr 2017
#53
So, you know such a hypothetical kit would be instant felony to possess and they aren't readily avai
AtheistCrusader
Apr 2017
#44
It will cost the families dearly but the precedence benefit will prove useful...
Baconator
Apr 2017
#52