Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Maryland's assault weapons ban upheld by US appeals court [View all]jimmy the one
(2,717 posts)42. iconic nut
...we will expand and strengthen background checks and close dangerous
loopholes in our current laws; repeal the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act
(PLCAA) to revoke the dangerous legal immunity protections gun makers and sellers now
enjoy; and keep weapons of war such as assault weapons and large capacity ammunition magazines
(LCAM's) off our streets
The platform appears saying to limit assault rifles from being carried in the streets, which doesn't necessarily mean an outright ban. Could simply be proscription against open carry, aside from ban in states which want a ban.
Your strained reasoning is specious & your argument is pathetic once again.
Here's the *national* Democratic Party Platform for 2016. These were supposed to apply everywhere,
remember?:
No I don't recall they are supposed to apply everywhere. How you get that? They take states victories as success.
You con once again, as your name implies.
You related to trump stooge kellycan conaway?
loopholes in our current laws; repeal the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act
(PLCAA) to revoke the dangerous legal immunity protections gun makers and sellers now
enjoy; and keep weapons of war such as assault weapons and large capacity ammunition magazines
(LCAM's) off our streets
The platform appears saying to limit assault rifles from being carried in the streets, which doesn't necessarily mean an outright ban. Could simply be proscription against open carry, aside from ban in states which want a ban.
Your strained reasoning is specious & your argument is pathetic once again.
Here's the *national* Democratic Party Platform for 2016. These were supposed to apply everywhere,
remember?:
No I don't recall they are supposed to apply everywhere. How you get that? They take states victories as success.
You con once again, as your name implies.
You related to trump stooge kellycan conaway?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
58 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I am sure trump would agree. Doing so would give his authoritative forces so much more power.
jmg257
Feb 2017
#7
"Guangzhou is a chemical weapons plant masquerading as a fertilizer plant.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Feb 2017
#19
"Put simply, we have no power to extend Second Amendment protections to weapons of war" WTF??
jmg257
Feb 2017
#6
I'm hugely offended when the 'christian right' (which is neither) pushes for hate against ME
N77VG
Feb 2017
#16
"Why is it that Liberals will twist themselves into emotional knots......."
pablo_marmol
Feb 2017
#22
Your header, at least, was accurate- much of what you posted *was* rubbish
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2017
#35
Still no evidence of these purported "conversion kits"- smells like Trump's 'wiretaps' to me.
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2017
#39
"Reread what I wrote". I did- and the parts you bolded are *also* incorrect:
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2017
#41
Prepare yourself for a verbose word-salad that doesn't really answer your question
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2017
#53
I'd like to see a citation of even one Senate/House "assault weapons ban" bill in the last ten years
benEzra
Mar 2017
#56