Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: im curious to know [View all]discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,569 posts)28. As much as this may be a wasted effort, here's a perspective.
Where the government fears the people, there is liberty; where the people fear the government, there is tyranny. The weight of history here is on the side of the government trusting the people. With that trust comes the people's responsibility to act within the law. This is the very basis for the idea of individual rights.
To address the 'tribe against the army' question: there is no scenario I can envision where a serviceman in the US would make war against his neighbors. However, should the time come as mentioned in the Declaration...
(That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.)
...I see at least as many service against the government as would be for it.
I don't trust government nor do politicians deserve any trust but I do trust our Guardsmen, Soldiers, Sailors and Marines.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Bazooka" is an archaic term, and general used only by those with limited knowledge and ....
Marengo
Apr 2017
#26
Essentially my reaction towards someone who uses "bazooka". It is however useful in the sense...
Marengo
Apr 2017
#37
Ridiculous. On the contrary, it weakens you argument. Please do continue using the term though
Marengo
Apr 2017
#41
I noticed you haven't responded to any posts on asymmetrical warfare in this thread...
Marengo
Apr 2017
#50
What are your qualifications for accurately assessing who can or cannot successfully engage...
Marengo
Apr 2017
#55
I submit that the very nature of asymmetrical warfare includes that any instance is successful.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Apr 2017
#57
Still very curious to know what qualifies you to accurately determine who may, or may not,...
Marengo
Apr 2017
#59
"(Y)our/our peashooters will be worthless" Ahem. Just last week in Afghanistan:
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2017
#32
The common 18th century definition of "free state" could indicate either for or against...
Marengo
Apr 2017
#25
Not changing. It is written they that live by the sword shall die by the sword.
caroldansen
Apr 2017
#4
re: "It is written they that live by the sword shall die by the sword."
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Apr 2017
#8