Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: im curious to know [View all]friendly_iconoclast
(15,333 posts)32. "(Y)our/our peashooters will be worthless" Ahem. Just last week in Afghanistan:
Without benefit of tanks, helicopters, and fixed-wing aircraft, all of which the current Afghan
government possesses.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/mar/23/afghan-taliban-seize-key-district-sangin-helmand-province
Afghan Taliban seize key district where UK lost 104 soldiers
The Taliban has captured a key district in Helmand province once considered the deadliest battlefield for British and US troops in Afghanistan.
The fall of Sangin on Thursday came amid the insurgents year-long push to expand their footprint in the Taliban heartland.
Since the withdrawal of Nato combat troops from Afghanistan at the end of 2014 and with only a smaller, US-led advise and training mission left behind Sangin has been seen as a key test of whether Afghan security forces can hold off advancing Taliban fighters.
The town is totemic for the US and UK as both nations have both suffered heavy losses there, but the Taliban see it as a key strategic base
The Taliban has captured a key district in Helmand province once considered the deadliest battlefield for British and US troops in Afghanistan.
The fall of Sangin on Thursday came amid the insurgents year-long push to expand their footprint in the Taliban heartland.
Since the withdrawal of Nato combat troops from Afghanistan at the end of 2014 and with only a smaller, US-led advise and training mission left behind Sangin has been seen as a key test of whether Afghan security forces can hold off advancing Taliban fighters.
The town is totemic for the US and UK as both nations have both suffered heavy losses there, but the Taliban see it as a key strategic base
It seems your grasp of military tactics is on a par with your grasp of history and Constitutional law.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Bazooka" is an archaic term, and general used only by those with limited knowledge and ....
Marengo
Apr 2017
#26
Essentially my reaction towards someone who uses "bazooka". It is however useful in the sense...
Marengo
Apr 2017
#37
Ridiculous. On the contrary, it weakens you argument. Please do continue using the term though
Marengo
Apr 2017
#41
I noticed you haven't responded to any posts on asymmetrical warfare in this thread...
Marengo
Apr 2017
#50
What are your qualifications for accurately assessing who can or cannot successfully engage...
Marengo
Apr 2017
#55
I submit that the very nature of asymmetrical warfare includes that any instance is successful.
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Apr 2017
#57
Still very curious to know what qualifies you to accurately determine who may, or may not,...
Marengo
Apr 2017
#59
"(Y)our/our peashooters will be worthless" Ahem. Just last week in Afghanistan:
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2017
#32
The common 18th century definition of "free state" could indicate either for or against...
Marengo
Apr 2017
#25
Not changing. It is written they that live by the sword shall die by the sword.
caroldansen
Apr 2017
#4
re: "It is written they that live by the sword shall die by the sword."
discntnt_irny_srcsm
Apr 2017
#8