Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Straw Man

(6,777 posts)
19. It's simple.
Sun Apr 9, 2017, 04:55 PM
Apr 2017
If somebody has obvious mental health issues, past suicide attempts, etc., why should it need to be reviewed by a judge? Sure, go ahead, but if it's serious mental illness, then what's the point?

Because we are a nation of laws. The denial of rights is a legal process. It should not be left to a healthcare professional to make a final determination on a legal matter. We are ruled by laws, not by doctors.

Restricting rights is a minor issue compared to the effects of gun violence.

Do you really believe that? Would you ay the same about stop-and-frisk? Michael Bloomberg thought it was very effective in reducing crime in New York City.

Once you start justifying the denial of rights, how do you decide where to stop?
Is the assumption mental illness can not be cured? Throck Mar 2017 #1
Are mentally ill people with motor vechicles safer? Throck Mar 2017 #2
Of course not. yagotme Mar 2017 #4
I support RKBA but background checks and restrictions for the mentally ill just make sense. Blue_Warrior Mar 2017 #3
See my #4 post. nt yagotme Mar 2017 #5
'mentally ill' is a moveable feast, and people within that category are more likely to be victims of AtheistCrusader Mar 2017 #12
Why don't the gun nuts understand this? Carter Johnson girl Apr 2017 #13
Who are these "gun nuts" you speak of? And what is your definition of "mentally ill"? friendly_iconoclast Apr 2017 #14
... Carter Johnson girl Apr 2017 #15
Let's take a look at this. Straw Man Apr 2017 #16
Sure. Carter Johnson girl Apr 2017 #18
It's simple. Straw Man Apr 2017 #19
. Carter Johnson girl Apr 2017 #20
That's how it currently works with the Gun Control Act gejohnston Apr 2017 #21
/ Carter Johnson girl Apr 2017 #22
Remember what I said about about advocacy groups gejohnston Apr 2017 #23
, Carter Johnson girl Apr 2017 #25
Just out of curiosity sarisataka Apr 2017 #29
just a few things gejohnston Apr 2017 #33
Around and around. Straw Man Apr 2017 #24
/ Carter Johnson girl Apr 2017 #28
I guess you don't like titles. Straw Man Apr 2017 #30
Mentally incompetent does not equal mentally ill. pablo_marmol Apr 2017 #17
Very misleading title and article. ManiacJoe Mar 2017 #6
As long as the person making the determination... discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2017 #7
Exactly. ManiacJoe Mar 2017 #9
Like the Trump White House, gun control advocacy relies upon 'faith-promoting rumor' friendly_iconoclast Mar 2017 #8
Headline is a lie. Straw Man Mar 2017 #10
Exactly kudzu22 Mar 2017 #11
This message was self-deleted by its author Snackshack Apr 2017 #26
So the next bill is they will sell guns to suicidal people kimbutgar Apr 2017 #27
Exactly how wild was the "wild west"? discntnt_irny_srcsm Apr 2017 #32
Anyone take the time to read the actual Bill? Alea Apr 2017 #31
Welcome to DU. yagotme Apr 2017 #34
Thanks for the welcome yagotme :) Alea Apr 2017 #35
You're welcome for the welcome. yagotme Apr 2017 #36
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»House Passes Bill Allowin...»Reply #19