Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: House Passes Bill Allowing Mentally Ill Veterans To Own Guns [View all]Straw Man
(6,777 posts)24. Around and around.
OK, so the healthcare professionals could testify. I still see no reason why a severely mentally ill person should be allowed to buy a firearm.
OK, but the ultimate decision rests with the judge. And please remember that the OP was not about "severely mentally ill" people. It was about veterans who need help managing their finances, and have then been unilaterally declared "mentally incompetent" by the VA.
I said restricting gun rights is a small issue compared to the amount of people dead from gun violence.
Actually, no you didn't. You said that restricting rights was a small issue.
I do not agree with stop-and-frisk.
Now you want to get picky-choosy about which rights you're going to restrict. Then you're going to have to provide some data to show that gun-control laws are more effective than other restrictions on rights, such as stop-and-frisk. Can you show that?
Gun rights aren't the same as typical human and American rights. It's a right to a weapon. That is completely different than normal American rights.
What are "normal American rights" if not something that is guaranteed by the Constitution? How much more "normal American" can you get?
There would be less gun violence if we had slightly more restrictions. It's been proven.
Umm... no, it hasn't. There are many restrictions now on the books that have done little or nothing to reduce gun violence. The AWB that was Federal law for 10 years and is now state law in CA, NY, CT, etc. is a case in point.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
36 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I support RKBA but background checks and restrictions for the mentally ill just make sense.
Blue_Warrior
Mar 2017
#3
'mentally ill' is a moveable feast, and people within that category are more likely to be victims of
AtheistCrusader
Mar 2017
#12
Who are these "gun nuts" you speak of? And what is your definition of "mentally ill"?
friendly_iconoclast
Apr 2017
#14
Like the Trump White House, gun control advocacy relies upon 'faith-promoting rumor'
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2017
#8