Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

discntnt_irny_srcsm

(18,605 posts)
2. re: "The strongest argument is that there is...
Tue Oct 10, 2017, 09:26 PM
Oct 2017

...NO utility in installing these modifications other than making these guns more deadly."

I addressed neither bump fire devices nor trigger cranks. However, are you 100% certain that there is no sporting competition, where one of these devices is permitted, where the winner is determined by the number on target rounds he fires within a set time?

Should such a suit move forward and if there is no such competition, I feel rather certain that the manufacturers may sponsor one simply to homulgate their product type.

Call names if it makes you feel better but I was mostly addressing firearm manufactures and dealers.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

On suing gun manufacturers [View all] discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2017 OP
Let's talk products liability HopeAgain Oct 2017 #1
re: "The strongest argument is that there is... discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2017 #2
Utility is a defense, not an element of products liability Always Right Oct 2017 #4
What does the "redneck level" of anyone ClarendonDem Oct 2017 #7
What about emotion and high hopes? ileus Oct 2017 #3
Government by knee-jerk emotion? discntnt_irny_srcsm Oct 2017 #5
"What about emotion and high hopes?" yagotme Oct 2017 #6
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»On suing gun manufacturer...»Reply #2