Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: What America's gun fanatics won't tell you [View all]gejohnston
(17,502 posts)21. Sorry, Marketwatch is
full of shit. The BoR are limits on government (negative rights), not granting anything to individuals.
The writer doesn't know what he is talking about and is cherry picking
He might know something about writing about the stock market and bitcoin, but he doesn't know shit about Constitutional law or civics.
https://www.marketwatch.com/topics/journalists/brett-arends
Here is a quote that he ignores (assuming he actually read it, since it looks plagiarized, see above)
What plan for the regulation of the militia may be pursued by the national government is impossible to be foreseen...The project of disciplining all the militia of the United States is as futile as it would be injurious if it were capable of being carried into execution... Little more can reasonably be aimed at with the respect to the people at large than to have them properly armed and equipped ; and in order to see that this be not neglected, it will be necessary to assemble them once or twice in the course of a year.
there is more
If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no recourse left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government, and which against the usurpations of the national rulers may be exerted with infinitely better prospect of success than against those of the rulers of an individual State. In a single State, if the persons intrusted with supreme power become usurpers, the different parcels, subdivisions, or districts of which it consists, having no distinct government in each, can take no regular measures for defense. The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms, without concert, without system, without resource; except in their courage and despair.
Nice virtue signaling agiprop for the uninformed (and people who flunked US History and Civics), not hardly a good argument.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
71 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Is that your only conclusion to the OP-ED after reading Alexander Hamilton's Federalist Paper 29?
ffr
Mar 2018
#2
I'm sorry, but you just made a straw man fallacy. I have offered no proposition at this point
ffr
Mar 2018
#4
"When you reply to a sourced article posted on D.U., you are replying to that sourced article."
Eko
Mar 2018
#46
That's a given. Articles are referenced sometimes at the top for LBN, but usually at the bottom.
ffr
Mar 2018
#55
You don't really think those assholes CARE what the constitution says, do you?
Ferrets are Cool
Mar 2018
#52
You forget that the findings in Miller were rendered moot by Heller. The same standard applies...
friendly_iconoclast
Mar 2018
#69