Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Kaleva

(38,815 posts)
10. Some responses to points you brought up
Thu Aug 2, 2018, 08:17 PM
Aug 2018

Your comment:

"Bringing up the quality of the door is irrelevant in my opinion. "

I do think the quality of the door(s) is very important as it should be part of the overall home defense plan as it's often the first line of defense against a home invader. A standard exterior door offers almost no defense against a home invader. Regardless of where one stands of the issue of private ownership of guns, reinforced doors ought to be a priority for those who feel home security is a need.

Your comment:

"In my eyes the greater burden of preparation falls on the person whose job description includes encountering violent and chaotic scenes. "

A homeowner who has a gun for protection has it because they feel there is a possibility of violent and chaotic actions being perpetrated against themselves or others, either in their homes or outside of their homes. So I would argue that the burden of preparation falls equally on both the police and the armed citizen.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Police shoot and kill hom...»Reply #10