Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yagotme

(4,033 posts)
2. "...(B)ound to enforce it."
Sun Apr 7, 2019, 10:04 PM
Apr 2019

That is the key, here, I believe. Ever heard of anyone getting a verbal warning for a speeding ticket, and someone else getting the max fine? One person getting arrested for public intoxication, and a different person getting a ride home? There has always been selective enforcement, at all levels of government. Sheriffs are elected by the local population, and many personally know them. Counties have different living situations, some, inner city, some very, very rural. The sheriff is most likely to ignore federal/state laws that the "locals" don't see as being a productive deterrent, or a politically "hot potato". The magazine/gun ban laws, for example, are being "ignored" by mostly rural sheriffs, whose county populations shoot, hunt, etc. with firearms, alongside the deputies of the local police force.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»Sauce for the goose: NC s...»Reply #2