Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Compromising with gun owners is the ONLY feasible path to passing meaningful gun control [View all]PTWB
(4,131 posts)25. Here's a good debate about that topic.
ASP is a decent channel if you can stomach the overt Christian preaching that occasionally pops up.
The attorney recommends you carry without a round chambered in most circumstances. I don't agree with all of his points but that's because I don't think that someone should be carrying a weapon at all if they're not well trained and proficient with that weapon.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Compromising with gun owners is the ONLY feasible path to passing meaningful gun control [View all]
PTWB
Dec 2021
OP
As I read the original op I thought about the difference between Responsible Gun
abqtommy
Dec 2021
#3
If it's irresponsible to carry a round in the chamber, why does law enforcement do so?
Dial H For Hero
Dec 2021
#4
I disagree with most on this forum on this particular issue, and am not hesitant to explain why.
Dial H For Hero
Dec 2021
#8
How is emphasizing the need for the 4 rules of gun safety against safety?
Dial H For Hero
Dec 2021
#11
Given that, there would be no point in you attending such a class, given that they almost
Dial H For Hero
Dec 2021
#13
The use of weapons in combat and the use of firearms in legal self defense have some overlap, but
Dial H For Hero
Dec 2021
#19
I actually recommended that you *not* take firearms self defense lessons, if you'll recall.
Dial H For Hero
Dec 2021
#42
Neither am I. War and legitimate self defense are two very different things.
Dial H For Hero
Dec 2021
#46
There's a legitimate debate to be had, but labeling anyone "irresponsible" and "unsafe" because they
Dial H For Hero
Dec 2021
#26
I actually have come up with what I (humbly) think would be a reasonable compromise.
Dial H For Hero
Dec 2021
#21
Thank you, but I'm confident that they can and will. The moment "assault weapons" are mentioned,
Dial H For Hero
Dec 2021
#27
On the whole I agree. It's simply a thought experiment. Both sides are far too entrenched for any
Dial H For Hero
Dec 2021
#37
No gun control advocate would disagree with any of these. Gun humpers have already
Scrivener7
Dec 2021
#20
Gun control advocates certainly do disagree with the compromises listed at the end of the OP.
Dial H For Hero
Dec 2021
#22
LOL! Poor, poor gun humpers. Their rights are always being trampled, and we should offer them
Scrivener7
Dec 2021
#28
No, dear. You are using the disagreement in this thread to say, "See? They are terrible
Scrivener7
Dec 2021
#30