Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: Compromising with gun owners is the ONLY feasible path to passing meaningful gun control [View all]Dial H For Hero
(2,971 posts)44. Just trying to help!
I think of shooting at targets or hunting animals for food. You and all your self defense talk makes me feel you think more of humans as targets.
Some humans are legitimate targets, are they not? And in any case, this is Gun Control & RKBA. Target shooting and hunting would actually be off topic here. Statement of Purpose: Discuss gun politics, gun control laws, the Second Amendment, the use of firearms for self-defense, and the use of firearms to commit crime and violence.
Self defense firearms training and firearms Safety instructors are two different things. I won't recommend you take a safety course. As you feel leaving the chamber empty is not a good idea. The O P was about new ideas and that was mine. You don't agree so here we are.
I've already taken a hunter safety course. The issue of carrying a round in the chamber of a handgun being used for self defense was never addressed, of course.
Every self defense class I've taken has recommended a round in the chamber.
I have owned weapons for 60 years and never once though of people as targets.
That seems a very odd thing for you to say, given that earlier in this thread you said:
I have used almost every weapon the army had at my time. I have been on the receiving end of automatic weapons too, so there's that
Were not the weapons you fired while in the Army were either being used in training (to practice shooting at people) or in combat (to actually shoot at people)?
Some humans are legitimate targets, are they not? And in any case, this is Gun Control & RKBA. Target shooting and hunting would actually be off topic here. Statement of Purpose: Discuss gun politics, gun control laws, the Second Amendment, the use of firearms for self-defense, and the use of firearms to commit crime and violence.
Self defense firearms training and firearms Safety instructors are two different things. I won't recommend you take a safety course. As you feel leaving the chamber empty is not a good idea. The O P was about new ideas and that was mine. You don't agree so here we are.
I've already taken a hunter safety course. The issue of carrying a round in the chamber of a handgun being used for self defense was never addressed, of course.
Every self defense class I've taken has recommended a round in the chamber.
I have owned weapons for 60 years and never once though of people as targets.
That seems a very odd thing for you to say, given that earlier in this thread you said:
I have used almost every weapon the army had at my time. I have been on the receiving end of automatic weapons too, so there's that
Were not the weapons you fired while in the Army were either being used in training (to practice shooting at people) or in combat (to actually shoot at people)?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
54 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Compromising with gun owners is the ONLY feasible path to passing meaningful gun control [View all]
PTWB
Dec 2021
OP
As I read the original op I thought about the difference between Responsible Gun
abqtommy
Dec 2021
#3
If it's irresponsible to carry a round in the chamber, why does law enforcement do so?
Dial H For Hero
Dec 2021
#4
I disagree with most on this forum on this particular issue, and am not hesitant to explain why.
Dial H For Hero
Dec 2021
#8
How is emphasizing the need for the 4 rules of gun safety against safety?
Dial H For Hero
Dec 2021
#11
Given that, there would be no point in you attending such a class, given that they almost
Dial H For Hero
Dec 2021
#13
The use of weapons in combat and the use of firearms in legal self defense have some overlap, but
Dial H For Hero
Dec 2021
#19
I actually recommended that you *not* take firearms self defense lessons, if you'll recall.
Dial H For Hero
Dec 2021
#42
Neither am I. War and legitimate self defense are two very different things.
Dial H For Hero
Dec 2021
#46
There's a legitimate debate to be had, but labeling anyone "irresponsible" and "unsafe" because they
Dial H For Hero
Dec 2021
#26
I actually have come up with what I (humbly) think would be a reasonable compromise.
Dial H For Hero
Dec 2021
#21
Thank you, but I'm confident that they can and will. The moment "assault weapons" are mentioned,
Dial H For Hero
Dec 2021
#27
On the whole I agree. It's simply a thought experiment. Both sides are far too entrenched for any
Dial H For Hero
Dec 2021
#37
No gun control advocate would disagree with any of these. Gun humpers have already
Scrivener7
Dec 2021
#20
Gun control advocates certainly do disagree with the compromises listed at the end of the OP.
Dial H For Hero
Dec 2021
#22
LOL! Poor, poor gun humpers. Their rights are always being trampled, and we should offer them
Scrivener7
Dec 2021
#28
No, dear. You are using the disagreement in this thread to say, "See? They are terrible
Scrivener7
Dec 2021
#30