Gun Control & RKBA

Detachable magazines are designed to be quick and easy to change. Firing 30 rounds with my Glock 19 takes two magazines (one magazine change, or about 1.5 seconds to change magazines)… with a 10 round magazine restriction, I’d be looking at firing 30 rounds in 3 magazines (two magazine changes, or about 3 seconds to change magazines).

Is there any data that suggests we would save a statistically significant number of lives by reducing standard capacity magazines to low capacity magazines?

I understand the argument that even one life is worth saving, but if we are going to be making that argument, there are many more dangerous substances, chemicals, and activities in our society that we should be banning long before we get to standard capacity magazines.

We do have a gun violence problem in our country but at the root of that problem is systemic oppression of minorities and the impoverished. Societal violence is a socioeconomic problem, not a magazine capacity problem.