Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yagotme

(3,819 posts)
22. Well, we agree on the end result.
Tue Jun 27, 2023, 12:39 PM
Jun 2023

Fewer crimes. Seems our arrival at such differs in view.

1. I agree, it isn't a full background check, that's just the vernacular in use. As far as social media, other constitutional hurdles must be overcome, or some folks will just think you're trying for a pure police state. As far as family/employer go, family isn't reliable/accurate enough at times. Haven't actually visited 3 of my 4 siblings in several years. B-day cards, C-mas cards, occasional e-mail is about it. Hardly enough to determine a go/no go on a constitutional right. And, I'm retired, so no current employer. LEO? They don't know anything about me. Because I don't break the law. A few years back, they were calling for a large snowfall (10-12&quot in our area. I have a 6-wheel drive 5-ton military surplus truck. Went to the city cops, told them that if necessary, I would volunteer my time/vehicle if needed for an emergency outside any plowed area. (Thankfully, the forecast was double what we actually got.) The dispatcher at the window didn't have the foggiest idea who I was, or how long I had lived in town (Over 20 years at same address.)

2.Read my #2 again. That scenario is completely unpredictable, and the only way to 100% stop it, is for there to be NO guns. Semi auto's on the NFA list won't stop the guy with a revolver, or a pump gun, or a bolt gun. You worry about the rate of fire, but the guy in the Pulse nightclub had all the time in the world. Could have used a muzzleloader, in fact. Same as Uvalde. Safe storage has no effect if the one storing the gun is going to be the one committing the crime. Or live-in family member, who kills you and breaks open the safe (Sandy Hook).

3. Funding isn't the problem with enforcing/sentencing. DA's, judges are at fault here. As far as executive orders, that's not how our system is supposed to work. EO's are used to get around the system. My job is to promote/elect congressmen that will stand up for what's right, not whatever the current lobbyist with a fistful of cash says.

Here in Maine... Easterncedar Jun 2023 #1
I'm on the 'gun enthusiast' (or 'Gun humper') side of things here, but The Mouth Jun 2023 #2
Thank you for at least admitting that some people have no business AndyS Jun 2023 #3
LOL The Mouth Jun 2023 #4
So AndyS Jun 2023 #5
What sort of "prevention" are we talking about? TexasDem69 Jun 2023 #6
I would modify the 'background check' to make it a AndyS Jun 2023 #7
Thanks for the response. TexasDem69 Jun 2023 #8
So, like Mouth you are satisfied with 'law abiding citizens' buying guns which AndyS Jun 2023 #9
I feel like you didn't really read my post TexasDem69 Jun 2023 #10
I did not ignore your point about punishing past deeds. Just followed gun logic to the AndyS Jun 2023 #11
Thanks again for the response TexasDem69 Jun 2023 #12
Look, I've commented on employers and family as much as needed. AndyS Jun 2023 #14
Thanks for responding TexasDem69 Jun 2023 #15
Again, you're not very good at this. AndyS Jun 2023 #16
Thanks sir TexasDem69 Jun 2023 #17
Let me ask this question TexasDem69 Jun 2023 #13
By 'law abiding citizens', do you actually mean "law abiding citizens"? yagotme Jun 2023 #18
If a gun is purchased legally through a FFL then one must assume AndyS Jun 2023 #19
Sure, I'll try to help. yagotme Jun 2023 #20
Okay: AndyS Jun 2023 #21
Well, we agree on the end result. yagotme Jun 2023 #22
Okay, so I guess your position is that the only way to lessen the carnage is AndyS Jun 2023 #24
Nope. My remedy is to lock those up who actually violate the law. yagotme Jul 2023 #39
The discussion can start The Mouth Jun 2023 #23
Keep it up Mouth. You're the best advertising for my movement anyone AndyS Jun 2023 #25
I surely will The Mouth Jun 2023 #26
LOL AndyS Jun 2023 #27
Thanks The Mouth Jun 2023 #28
So how do you feel about this? AndyS Jun 2023 #29
It has exactly nothing to do with whether The Mouth Jun 2023 #30
So, you don't think it is within the responsibility of the state to AndyS Jun 2023 #31
It's the responsibility of the parents. Period The Mouth Jun 2023 #32
If the State has no interest in protecting children from irresponsible parents AndyS Jun 2023 #33
Great questions The Mouth Jun 2023 #34
The question I'm asking doesn't have anything to do with your demands. AndyS Jun 2023 #35
This is a question about *parenting* The Mouth Jun 2023 #36
Just one more question for clarity and I'll stop AndyS Jun 2023 #37
I do not think and did not say "The state has no interest in children's welfare in general" The Mouth Jun 2023 #38
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»More time, more discretio...»Reply #22