Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
In reply to the discussion: ### (Closed) Discussion to create a process to un-ban members ### [View all]krispos42
(49,445 posts)89. It's to create the process of reinstatement...
...the first test case of which will be rDigital's status of being blocked.
And since this internal stuff, it can stay in the Group.
TopBack to the top of the page
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
ShareGet links to this post
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
91 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The biggest lie is saying the holocaust would have been avoided if Jews became monsters
graham4anything
Nov 2012
#4
I am not a group member as I never signed up. So it's not my place to yea or nay
graham4anything
Nov 2012
#9
I don't believe in censorship, so that would be a bring the poster back vote
graham4anything
Nov 2012
#11
You say, "The biggest lie is saying the holocaust would have been avoided if Jews became monsters"
AnotherMcIntosh
Nov 2012
#19
Huh? I am arguing the post not the person. And I would not censor anyone.
graham4anything
Nov 2012
#20
rDigital is the subject of the OP. Your post #4 is either related or unrelated to rDigital.
AnotherMcIntosh
Nov 2012
#29
My vote and opinion is that there should be no formalized standards, rules, procedures,
petronius
Nov 2012
#7
so then, are you saying that all previously blocked DUers should be reinstated?
Tuesday Afternoon
Nov 2012
#43
Yes. I think we all have the tools to personalize our own DU experiences, and if
petronius
Nov 2012
#48
No, I think it makes more sense to discuss Group stuff within the particular Group
petronius
Nov 2012
#50
so, if One is unhappy with what goes on here One should be able to start a thread about it rather
Tuesday Afternoon
Nov 2012
#51
Given the timing and context of another post (identified at #30), I agree.
AnotherMcIntosh
Nov 2012
#32
Respectfully, I don't know exactly what "rightwing nonsense" that WStupidity is referring to so
AnotherMcIntosh
Nov 2012
#37
Hoyt has not stopped making unfounded associations/accusations about gun owners...
PavePusher
Nov 2012
#34
In contrast to your claim, rDigital never indicated that he agreed with the rw nonsense.
AnotherMcIntosh
Nov 2012
#35
What you say is not only unresponsive but it is veritably untrue. Those who look can see this.
AnotherMcIntosh
Nov 2012
#75
No he did not. You cannot point to where he "made a broad brush attack of virulent anti-semitic
AnotherMcIntosh
Nov 2012
#38
You said, "I can understand that a reasonable person would conclude the ban was justifiable ..."
AnotherMcIntosh
Nov 2012
#55