Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Media

Nitram

(24,717 posts)

8. For this story to have any significance, it would have to inform us how many stories about Trump

Reply to sharedvalues (Original post)

Sat Jun 2, 2018, 05:10 PM

Jun 2018

in the Times on the same day had Democratic commentary. I've seen people accuse the WaPo of the same thing, which I know to be way off base because I checked and it just wasn't so. A very large percentage of news on the web is borrowed from stories first published in these two excellent papers. They do real in-depth journalism, and are quick to announce it publicly when they get something wrong. Attacks on good media like this play into the hands of right wingers intent on creating their own alternative reality where there are not its and you "can't trust the media." You know, just like Trump has been saying.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

28 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The NYT is effectively pro-Trump. That's bad!! Data here. [View all] sharedvalues Jun 2018 OP

I don't know, I see a lot of criticism of trump from the NYT. It's good to see. Hoyt Jun 2018 #1

Agreed, but it would be nice if they quoted congressional Democrats John Fante Jun 2018 #5

They do John, all the time. This OP is a hysterical hit piece. Nitram Jun 2018 #9

NYT has serious bothsideism and "savvy" journalism problems sharedvalues Jun 2018 #13

Sounds more like Trump's "Fake News Media." Nitram Jun 2018 #17

"The NYT is effectively pro-Trump." Comatose Sphagetti Jun 2018 #2

I remember it was the same way with George W Bush kimbutgar Jun 2018 #3

"Balance" is the biggest problem. sharedvalues Jun 2018 #7

The Times quotes Dems all the time. And is very critical of Trump. Nitram Jun 2018 #10

No they are not critical. sharedvalues Jun 2018 #11

You are wrong, The Times is extremely critical of Trump and the Republicans who enable him. Nitram Jun 2018 #15

Incorrect - and now who's supplying anecdata? sharedvalues Jun 2018 #20

Could you show me where I wrote that "truth and objectivity implies equal volume of criticism of Nitram Jun 2018 #22

You did a search sharedvalues Jun 2018 #24

Frankly, I want to know what They are up to, what they're doing, and what they're saying. Nitram Jun 2018 #25

Well said. N/t obnoxiousdrunk Jun 2018 #27

Well said Comatose Sphagetti Jun 2018 #14

No braddy Jun 2018 #4

NYT had a Republican Editor empedocles Jun 2018 #6

For this story to have any significance, it would have to inform us how many stories about Trump Nitram Jun 2018 #8

Read Jay Rosen. Masha Gessen. "Bothsidesism" is a thing sharedvalues Jun 2018 #12

I don't need to. I can go to the source and form my own opinion. Have you tried that? Nitram Jun 2018 #16

I've worked on PR. sharedvalues Jun 2018 #19

Save your sympathy for someone more deserving. Nitram Jun 2018 #21

Ok now I see your point sharedvalues Jun 2018 #23

NYT suffers from serious both sider-ism ladym55 Jun 2018 #18

good post yonder Jun 2018 #26

Message auto-removed Name removed Aug 2018 #28