Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Media

still_one

(96,802 posts)

3. while your points are valid, and I am no fan of The Hill or Politico, which I regard as gossip rags,

Reply to sharedvalues (Original post)

Sun Nov 18, 2018, 04:46 PM

Nov 2018

more interested in stirring things up rather than reporting the news, they do have various reporters from different political perspectives, so it bothers me little that articles from them are posted here. I just take them with a large grain of salt

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

10 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The Hill is owned by a Trumpite billionaire-- don't quote them please! [View all] sharedvalues Nov 2018 OP

Thanks. We need to avoid giving them clicks. ZZenith Nov 2018 #1

Thanks for this background info. n/t sagesnow Nov 2018 #2

while your points are valid, and I am no fan of The Hill or Politico, which I regard as gossip rags, still_one Nov 2018 #3

Politico and the Hill are quite different. Management matters. sharedvalues Nov 2018 #5

Good information to know. Thanks still_one Nov 2018 #7

twitter is full of right wing stuff as is rotstory. shall we ban those? nt msongs Nov 2018 #4

Shall we post stuff from fox or zerohedge at some point you have to consider the source Fullduplexxx Nov 2018 #6

We should note agenda behind news: The Hill is a good example sharedvalues Nov 2018 #8

Why The Hill's media bias rating is wrong sharedvalues Sep 2019 #9

A great example of Hill's rw bias sharedvalues Sep 2019 #10