Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

usonian

(14,534 posts)
2. skuM's Section 230 "protection" is a hoax.
Thu Nov 14, 2024, 12:31 PM
Nov 14

It was found that TikTok's algorithm, and we are talking algorithms here, expressed an editorial opinion, which violates the "pass through" stipulation of Section 230 of the CDA.

https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2024/08/court-section-230-doesnt-shield-tiktok-from-blackout-challenge-death-suit/

The judge cited a recent Supreme Court ruling that "held that a platform’s algorithm that reflects 'editorial judgments' about compiling the third-party speech it wants in the way it wants' is the platform’s own 'expressive product' and is therefore protected by the First Amendment," Shwartz wrote.

Because TikTok's For You Page (FYP) algorithm decides which third-party speech to include or exclude and organizes content, TikTok's algorithm counts as TikTok's own "expressive activity." That "expressive activity" is not protected by Section 230, which only shields platforms from liability for third-party speech, not platforms' own speech, Shwartz wrote.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Media»Want to quit X? Here's yo...»Reply #2