Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

delrem

(9,688 posts)
12. not good enough. no horns on head. no spitting of fire. no dead babies.
Wed Jul 17, 2013, 10:18 PM
Jul 2013

Tho' to be sure it's better than Rolling Stone using an actual undemonized photo. That's unamerican, esp. since he's yet to go to trial. What we want to see is a satanic enemy through and through. Someone who was born evil, born with a forked tail and an evil smile, and whose first action was to rip the cross off the nurse-nun trying to bathe his hellspawn body.

So we can know the truth.

We don't want to know *anything* about some "evolution" toward terrorism. "Evolution" is totally debunked, and anyone who'd suggest it is a commie or terrorist who wouldn't know truth if it gob-smacked them.

If we want to get the *true* story right, we've got to get the special effects down.
Maybe the Rolling Stone editors who decided on that cover should be droned? With an all-american, peace and freedom and democracy hellfire missile?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Media»Rolling Stone - The edito...»Reply #12