Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

African American

Land Shark

(6,348 posts)

12. There is evidence, but nobody is required to have PROOF at the outset of any legal case

Reply to La Lioness Priyanka (Reply #11)

Thu Dec 8, 2016, 01:03 PM

Dec 2016

The demands for proof in order to proceed with discovery of facts is one of the most bizarre things I've come across in the twenty one years since I started law school.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why do both people love conspiracies, while denying oppression that is in plain sight? [View all] La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 OP

Okay, there's pretty clear election fraud Uponthegears Dec 2016 #1

How so? I'm not following your logic. Dream Girl Dec 2016 #2

because itbolsters the argument that voter fraud is a huge problem La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #4

Just skimmed the article quickly. It makes no sense. I'm not getting it... Dream Girl Dec 2016 #5

The Green Party sued to overturn Tennessee's voter ID law. progressoid Dec 2016 #6

If you want to undercut your own argument La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #7

The Interstate Cross Check system deserves to be investigated. Voter ID laws need to be overturned think Dec 2016 #3

There is so much open oppression. Wouldn't there be more under cover of Secrecy? Land Shark Dec 2016 #8

no, it wouldn't because one comes with threats of jail and others don't La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #9

In those states actually making insider fraud illegal, it is LESS punishable than voter fraud Land Shark Dec 2016 #10

there is really no proof of this. i dont get why we push a narrative that has no evidence La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #11

There is evidence, but nobody is required to have PROOF at the outset of any legal case Land Shark Dec 2016 #12

where is this evidence of massive election fraud? La Lioness Priyanka Dec 2016 #13