Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pnwmom

(109,647 posts)
17. More on that here:
Thu Dec 27, 2018, 09:32 AM
Dec 2018

In 2012, the Obama administration took action against it, saying there was no scientific evidence to support its claims. Reading includes reading comprehension, and there was no evidence the babies were understanding the sounds they'd learned to repeat.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/my-baby-cant-read-company-penalized-for-reading-claims/

For years, consumers were peppered with infomercials and Internet ads claiming that parents and caregivers who used the system could have kids reading such books as the Harry Potter series by the time they were 3 or 4.

The company claimed that through the "Your Baby Can Read" flash cards, lift-a-flap books and videos that as early children as young as nine-months-old could start to read. The program cost about $200.

SNIP

Not so, the federal government has decreed. In a settlement announced Friday by the Federal Trade Commission, the founder of "Your Baby Can Read," Dr. Robert Titzer, along with his company, Infant Learning, agreed to judgments of more than $185 million to resolve charges filed by the agency alleging the program had no scientific evidence to make the claims.

The FTC settled on that figure because $185 million was amounted to Infant Learning's gross sales from Baby Can Read. The company that marketed the program went out of business in 2012 when the agency first took action against it. However, the FTC said it was still selling copies of the program online after that time. Infant Learn and Titzer are still selling child education programs online.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Oh my God. How beautiful. I am in awe! We need him when grown up. 😘 sprinkleeninow Dec 2018 #1
Why do we still stipulate race? Laffy Kat Dec 2018 #2
I know. This was noticed by a poster on the linked entry of the prodigy. sprinkleeninow Dec 2018 #3
Probably to make the Trumptards heads spin LiberalLovinLug Dec 2018 #5
Because racists pretend that white people are superior in every way. Ever heard of the book tblue37 Dec 2018 #8
Because this is posted in the JustAnotherGen Dec 2018 #9
Some of the meanest white boys I remember from school were very smart, school-wise. pnwmom Dec 2018 #16
PNW - IF the video is true - it absolutely is JustAnotherGen Dec 2018 #18
I accept ALL your statistics about the unfair discipline of black children, especially boys. pnwmom Dec 2018 #19
Amazing! Love this post LittleGirl Dec 2018 #4
Not so sure about the value of this. If the baby seemed to be having fun pnwmom Dec 2018 #6
I don't know why you assume this child isn't getting any of the above MaryMagdaline Dec 2018 #10
I am familiar with the programs used to teach with those flashcards. pnwmom Dec 2018 #15
I didn't so much hear words jodymarie aimee Dec 2018 #7
He's still a baby! His sounds will catch up - it's the recognition of signs that is phenomenal MaryMagdaline Dec 2018 #11
Palette and tongue muscle and oral motor skills not yet fully developed. LanternWaste Dec 2018 #20
I found it amazing how he turned a card that was upside down so that he could read it properly and MaryMagdaline Dec 2018 #12
Exactly! laserhaas Dec 2018 #14
The program is called "Your Baby Can Read." Google it. Shell_Seas Dec 2018 #13
More on that here: pnwmom Dec 2018 #17
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»African American»9 month old Black Baby - ...»Reply #17