Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

BlueIn_W_Pa

(842 posts)
2. I think this is the point
Thu Aug 3, 2023, 02:01 PM
Aug 2023

"No harm was done to Lacks by harvesting the cells", and it's not like she did anything or achieved anything to make them special - it was just who she was.

They would've been thrown to the trash, and none of the innumerable benefits derived from it would've ever happened.

There was no legal claim, no harm done, and they didn't know what they had or what it meant at the time, other than "WTF are these cells still going".

That said, there's definitely a moral obligation and recognition owed to her - even if it was an accidental discovery - and her immediate family rightfully should have been cared for with the discovery and its' potential.

Problem is, apparently there's an issue with holding companies to a moral standard :/

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»African American»Henrietta Lacks - Exploit...»Reply #2