Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eppur_se_muova

(39,042 posts)
27. These are language *families*, which may have several members each.
Tue Aug 20, 2013, 12:05 PM
Aug 2013
Today, the two main groups of Eskimos are the Inuit of northern Alaska, Canada and Greenland, and the Yupik of Central Alaska. The Yupik comprise speakers of four distinct Yupik languages that originated in western Alaska, in South Central Alaska along the Gulf of Alaska coast, and the Russian Far East.

The term Eskimo is still in common use, and particularly in Alaska to include both Yupik and Inupiat. No universal term other than Eskimo, inclusive of all Inuit and Yupik people, exists for the Inuit and Yupik peoples.[1] In Canada and Greenland, the term Eskimo has fallen out of favour, as it is sometimes considered pejorative and has been replaced by the term Inuit. The Canadian Constitution Act of 1982, sections 25[2] and 35[3] recognized the Inuit as a distinctive group of aboriginal peoples in Canada.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eskimo



Every time I read about the Eskimo/Inuit controversy, I get a slightly different understanding ... perhaps it is best to recognize the situation is in flux. Last I heard the Alaskan group had decided the "Eskimo" referred to themselves specifically, and not to other Inuit. YMMV, apparently.

Apple recognizes "Inukituk" as the term for the language of the Inuit:



I thought the term "Sioux" was also considered pejorative, but can't find corroboration in a quick search.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Map That Should Be In School Books? [View all] KittyWampus Aug 2013 OP
Yes, indeed. NYC_SKP Aug 2013 #1
That is an interesting map. Jenoch Aug 2013 #2
Absolutely pscot Aug 2013 #3
Absolutely. madamesilverspurs Aug 2013 #4
it would be nice to see a map of Africa rurallib Aug 2013 #5
And the Palestianians as well. Rozlee Aug 2013 #39
Of course A Little Weird Aug 2013 #6
I like it! Martin Eden Aug 2013 #7
Similar maps were in a lot of my school books. mysuzuki2 Aug 2013 #8
I wonder why humans feel the need to be separate from each other? CarrieLynne Aug 2013 #9
It's a funny human trait Hydra Aug 2013 #11
it seems to be somehow wrapped up in language. KittyWampus Aug 2013 #15
I don't think this is division, separation, etc. DissidentVoice Aug 2013 #18
It was in my American History book. Tuesday Afternoon Aug 2013 #10
Wish that had been in my history book Hydra Aug 2013 #12
great map, but with the anti-actual facts cretins in charge of the textbook committees, this won't niyad Aug 2013 #13
Would be interesting to see a historical representation RVN VET Aug 2013 #14
Yes! Yes! Yes! ANOIS Aug 2013 #16
Very enlightening DissidentVoice Aug 2013 #17
These are language *families*, which may have several members each. eppur_se_muova Aug 2013 #27
How did Apache get so lost from rest of Athabaskan? ErikJ Aug 2013 #19
The Navajos and the Apaches (both Athabaskan languages) dbackjon Aug 2013 #31
My father has a map Iliyah Aug 2013 #20
Do you have a link for this? jimlup Aug 2013 #21
It's off facebook but comported w/what I remembered from Anthropology days (one of my majors in U.) KittyWampus Aug 2013 #22
Googling "Native American Linguistic Groups" here's another map. I'd suggest doing similar search KittyWampus Aug 2013 #23
One more from an .edu website KittyWampus Aug 2013 #25
Excellent - thanks - these are very helpful /nt jimlup Aug 2013 #28
Be sure to attach a date to it ... those boundaries shifted plenty before whites immigrated. nt eppur_se_muova Aug 2013 #24
VERY good point! KittyWampus Aug 2013 #26
It came down to resources...... AnneD Aug 2013 #29
That was going to be my comment dbackjon Aug 2013 #32
It was in mine Fearless Aug 2013 #30
Big K&R defacto7 Aug 2013 #33
There is a Native American map that has been produced by Aaron Carapella.... xocet Aug 2013 #34
Thanks! good find ...nt dougolat Aug 2013 #38
It's incomplete, and some of the names are wrong. malthaussen Aug 2013 #35
Message auto-removed Name removed Aug 2013 #36
how to reconcile this guilt with some other guilt GaribaldiB5 Aug 2013 #37
It's just an interesting, educational map. secondvariety Aug 2013 #40
This is a map of Linguistic Groups; greiner3 Aug 2013 #41
"Where today are the Pequot? Where are the Narragansett, the Mohican, the Pokanoket, tclambert Aug 2013 #42
absolutely !!!! unionthug777 Aug 2013 #43
Latest Discussions»Alliance Forums»First Americans»Map That Should Be In Sch...»Reply #27