Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sofa king

(10,857 posts)
11. Hee hee!
Thu Aug 8, 2013, 10:55 PM
Aug 2013

Perhaps I should elaborate. The future is HUGE! Our significance in it is probably negligible. Science fiction is usually about the future, or some alternative timeline, and because it's literature it's primarily for and about people.

There are an infinity of paths the course of future humanity can take, but it seems to me that several possible ones present themselves. We are quickly unlocking the secrets of our own biology and reproduction, and so far we're showing every inclination fiddle with ourselves, to improve and forcibly evolve ourselves beyond what we are. We are discovering the mathematical underpinnings of thought itself and applying those to machines, who may supersede us or merge with us or exterminate us or whatever. We are reaching for the stars with physiologies not designed for weightlessness or other gravities, and even if we don't mess with ourselves, some of us shall evolve and diverge if we make it out there.

Or, we can burn the earth and exterminate ourselves, or bomb ourselves back to the stone age and continue as we are for a little while longer.

Most likely we're either gonna die or change, and whatever the case the importance of us as we are will be merely a brick in the ziggurat of time.

But not in science fiction! In science fiction, we are silent passengers anywhere in space and time, beyond ourselves, beyond our ultimate significance--and always at the center of it all. That's one of the reasons I love it--science fiction always goes where we ourselves will never go. Optimism.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I guess it's good that I haven't read Ender's Game. kentauros Aug 2013 #1
Fair enough! sofa king Aug 2013 #2
It sounds interesting, and I have heard of Brin. kentauros Aug 2013 #3
You haven't read Dune? Dr. Strange Aug 2013 #4
I liked the SciFi miniseries, too. kentauros Aug 2013 #5
The sci fi miniseries was really quite good. lumberjack_jeff Aug 2013 #13
As I literally cannot read the book, kentauros Aug 2013 #16
Years ago, I had really hoped.... sofa king Aug 2013 #6
You know what I think would revolutionize sci fi? Dr. Strange Aug 2013 #7
HELL, YES! sofa king Aug 2013 #8
There are many long novels or series of books... krispos42 Aug 2013 #9
That series actually ran through to eleven books Posteritatis Aug 2013 #17
Nice post, oval-face. Orrex Aug 2013 #18
Stop yanking my Chani, you insolent Face Dancer. Dr. Strange Aug 2013 #19
After Frank Herbert's wife died, he took up learning to cook uppityperson Sep 2013 #20
Frank Herbert may have been a nice guy Fortinbras Armstrong Feb 2014 #27
.....umm..... AverageJoe90 Aug 2013 #10
Hee hee! sofa king Aug 2013 #11
The Dune film was very good, IMO. Codeine Aug 2013 #12
In the proper hands (think Peter Jackson) brilliant novels can be rendered . . . MrModerate Aug 2013 #14
Even accounting for taste, it's hard for me to imagine . . . MrModerate Aug 2013 #15
I just JesterCS Nov 2013 #21
Did you like the "trick" at the end? sofa king Dec 2013 #23
I dont plan to watch it quakerboy Dec 2013 #22
Reviews have been largely positive. sofa king Dec 2013 #24
Of course it is. mzteris Dec 2013 #25
Well. . . OrwellwasRight Jan 2014 #26
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Science Fiction»Folks, I think Ender's Ga...»Reply #11