Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Sports

JohnnyRingo

(19,570 posts)

3. Unless they post their pix at every gate I don't see it as enforceable.

Reply to underpants (Original post)

Sat Jan 11, 2025, 09:59 AM

Jan 11

Of course there's face recognition tech now, but I'm not so sure they have those everywhere.
The threat of attest will probably be enough to keep them at home in front of the big screen though.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

MLB bans two Yankees fans who interfered with Dodgers' Betts [View all] underpants Jan 11 OP

A good decision DeeDeeNY Jan 11 #1

Same! Drum Jan 11 #2

Unless they post their pix at every gate I don't see it as enforceable. JohnnyRingo Jan 11 #3

You'd be surprised. Soccer weeded out hooligans 20 years ago underpants Jan 11 #4

Neither was a season ticket holder, apparently. rsdsharp Jan 11 #5

Ah. Okay. underpants Jan 11 #6

I know they originally said one was a season ticket holder. rsdsharp Jan 11 #7

A lot of tickets are bought by corporations underpants Jan 11 #8

Well, it said "the person" who is the holder wasn't at the game. rsdsharp Jan 11 #9