Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Football

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Auggie

(32,096 posts)
Sun Nov 11, 2012, 03:46 PM Nov 2012

49ers run game an innovative relic [View all]

San Francisco Chronicle / 11-11-12

Like a teenager examining a typewriter or an eight-track tape, Rams middle linebacker James Laurinaitis scratched his head this past week while studying video of the 49ers' offense.

In today's I-formation era, the 49ers will split running backs Frank Gore and Kendall Hunter at equal depth in the backfield, the NFL equivalent of using a rotary phone. From that formation, they will run double sweeps and two-back traps - X's and O's straight out of a '90s video game.

SNIP

While spread offenses are routinely bringing extra wide receivers onto the field, the 49ers often trot out additional linemen. On Gore's 23-yard touchdown run in a season-opening win at Green Bay, he ran over the right side of a seven-linemen formation that featured 355-pound guard Leonard Davis at tight end and 308-pound center Daniel Kilgore at wing back.

Such jumbo packages can be particularly effective against modern-day defenses, which have shrunk to combat the spread. There has been an influx of smaller and quicker ends and outside linebackers to keep up with the bevy of skill-position players in pass-happy attacks.

READ MORE: http://www.sfgate.com/49ers/article/49ers-run-game-an-innovative-relic-4026982.php

Interesting read ...

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Football»49ers run game an innovat...»Reply #0