Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Football

tishaLA

(14,762 posts)

1. Sure, because the Eagles didn't win the SB this year

Reply to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Tue Feb 24, 2026, 11:35 PM

Tuesday

they only wanted to take away a very effective tool from a SB-winning team and never really cared about their fig leaves of player safety and aesthetics ("it looks like rugby, not football!&quot . Hilariously, the Bill voted to eliminate it last year but spent the season using it because, I guess, it's only detrimental when other teams (or one specific other team) do it.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

2 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Competition committee co-chairman Rich McKay doesn't expect tush push ban proposal in 2026 [View all] Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Tuesday OP

Sure, because the Eagles didn't win the SB this year tishaLA Tuesday #1

The Bears demonstrated the way to deal with the "Tush Push." Morbius Thursday #2