Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
In reply to the discussion: The myth of moral equivalence [View all]guillaumeb
(42,649 posts)56. Utter nonsense.
I can only conclude that you did not read the actual original post, or my response here. And that is why no substantive discussion can take place.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I did not say anything was excusable or that there was any attempt at excusing behavior
marylandblue
Sep 2018
#2
Demonstrating only that you misunderstand the proper application of the fallacy.
guillaumeb
Sep 2018
#14
I have linked to many articles demonstrating how covering up sexual assault is
guillaumeb
Sep 2018
#42
What you are doing is pointing out that abuse and coverup has happened elsewhere,
trotsky
Sep 2018
#32
What you did was demonstrate that you misunderstood what I wrote, and have written.
guillaumeb
Sep 2018
#41
And when you understand why it is used, you will see that it does not apply.
guillaumeb
Sep 2018
#38
But we aren't (religion) allowed to mention (religion) what makes the RCC (religion)
trotsky
Sep 2018
#34