Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

gtar100

(4,192 posts)
59. The thought crossed my mind that if we consider other species, we might find an example.
Sat Dec 15, 2018, 10:18 PM
Dec 2018

As in, a world without humans and religions or discernible deities. But then, we don't acknowledge the internal experience of other animals or insects or plants other than their biological imperatives. With few exceptions, most people are content to observe behavior and environmental effects of other species rather than actually communicate with them - something considered laughable in these times. So if you can imagine people interacting as animals do with an overlay of our economics and our distinctly human social interactions, that might be a model. But no guarantee of peace and harmony.

It seems like a world without religion or faith is imaginable for individuals - there's apparently no survival requirement to practice a religion or believe in deities, like the need for food, water, activity and sleep. Even among groups of friends, religion and a professed faith is not necessary, just shared values which don't have to include religion or gods. But it gets more complicated with larger groups like tribes and communities. How can groups like this survive if there is not an acknowledgement and and some form of celebration of the traditions that identify a place for the the group and its people in the wider context of reality? The only time I see people making attempts at trying to live without religion or faith is happening in our modern world - either by force of state (China, as an example... but that's more like suppression than absence of faith and religion) or through the influences of subcultures that embrace beliefs such as materialism that assert that life is meaningless, purposeless and doomed to entropy. The rise of materialism has not reduced war and violence but on the contrary may have only made us better at the effectiveness of our destructive capacity.

So what is needed to make the people of Utopia cohesive over generations, avoid war and live peacefully? They are going to have to share a common set of values in order to live and work together. Sooner or later it's going to come down to the questions of how did we get here, why do we exist, what is our purpose and all the things that religions address. Let's say they all agree on the premise that deities do not exist and they embrace the materialistic view in which life happened by "happy chemical accident", would they still not have to have rules like don't steal, don't kill, don't be a jerk... that sort of thing, to get along? Under what premise? Why? Survival of the species? Why? It's all meaningless and purposeless, right? The species will survive; that's not a concern for the individual and there are no second chances for the individual - that's an inevitable conclusion under materialism. So personal ethics can stop one from hurting others in the pursuit of personal gain without the need for the interjection of a deity... okay. But as soon as you come to an agreement with another on the ethical behaviors desired in one's Utopia, those ethics are no longer "personal". And philosophers will inevitably ask, what is the origin of the ethics we have embraced. Call it God, don't call it God; but from whence arose the shared, non-personal sense of ethics? Another biological imperative? Brain chemistry? Those are hardly complete answers.

I can see it working in small groups but not larger groups. Maybe somebody else can imagine a world without religion and faith but I just don't see it but I do see a lot of complications happening with the current attempt at it. Don't confuse this with an attempt to excuse religious beliefs and practices that hurt and devalue people. People abuse religions for their own personal gain precisely because religion itself is a power within interrelated groups of people and people are vying for that power. But religions do not manifest the same way everywhere. Cultures of indigenous people have survived thousands of years because of the common thread religious practices have had in tying their generations together into a cohesive story line that provides a sense of place, meaning and purpose for themselves. Economics and basic survival requirements just don't seem to be enough to hold people together for any serious length of time. I think it requires a common philosophy and, more importantly, common practices we can rightfully define as religious to bind people together into a culture.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Someone beat you to this... True Dough Dec 2018 #1
I wondered who would be the first. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #2
John Lennon was a genius in his own right. MineralMan Dec 2018 #6
+1 LongtimeAZDem Dec 2018 #27
Yeah, probably best not to have gone there Major Nikon Dec 2018 #65
Yes. If your argument is refuted in a Wikipedia article, MineralMan Dec 2018 #71
Oh, the angry atheist meme Lordquinton Dec 2018 #72
No, Lennon was obviously an angry man guillaumeb Dec 2018 #79
What's the issue? Lordquinton Dec 2018 #81
I gave my opinion as to my favorite of the Beatles. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #82
And you brought up the angry atheist trope Lordquinton Dec 2018 #83
No, you claimed to find it. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #85
You repeated it even Lordquinton Dec 2018 #87
Ok, claim a victory. eom guillaumeb Dec 2018 #89
Gladly Lordquinton Dec 2018 #91
Claim another victory. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #92
What tactic is that? Lordquinton Dec 2018 #93
Can you imagine it, Guy? MineralMan Dec 2018 #3
I asked the questions of the readers. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #17
It's simple etiquette to answer your own thought questions marylandblue Dec 2018 #24
This is a common pattern here. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #43
No, you don't understand this one at all, since I did reply marylandblue Dec 2018 #45
You replied with non-answers. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #48
You didn't like my answer. I understand. marylandblue Dec 2018 #51
No faith or religion? thbobby Dec 2018 #4
you don't think slavery qazplm135 Dec 2018 #33
Since crusades and pogroms are religious in nature, I think we would not have those particular forms marylandblue Dec 2018 #35
they are religious in nature in the sense that qazplm135 Dec 2018 #36
Whataboutism and illogic. marylandblue Dec 2018 #37
Speaking of Stalin: guillaumeb Dec 2018 #44
wait a minute qazplm135 Dec 2018 #47
Post removed Post removed Dec 2018 #50
yeah no qazplm135 Dec 2018 #52
"...first of all Judaism is BOTH a religion AND an ethnicity." Adsos Letter Dec 2018 #53
Agree except qazplm135 Dec 2018 #70
Post removed Post removed Dec 2018 #55
Working out well for me. safeinOhio Dec 2018 #5
I asked some questions. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #18
I imagine a world without flamebait. Act_of_Reparation Dec 2018 #7
Not here, though. MineralMan Dec 2018 #8
Like this derivative one? guillaumeb Dec 2018 #15
You reap what you sow, Billy. Act_of_Reparation Dec 2018 #73
So what you're getting at here is that religion doesn't make us any better. trotsky Dec 2018 #9
That might have been what you read into it. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #16
China has over 4 times the population of the US with a similar land mass Major Nikon Dec 2018 #67
#Whataboutism n/t trotsky Dec 2018 #74
I asked some questions. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #19
Probably because nobody felt like taking the obvious bait LongtimeAZDem Dec 2018 #57
Bingo. trotsky Dec 2018 #76
If you think it is, guillaumeb Dec 2018 #80
Because everyone can see you posted flamebait. trotsky Dec 2018 #75
The world would be better in multiple aspects: DetlefK Dec 2018 #10
Pure imagination. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #20
HAHAHAHAHA! You are changing the topic mid-conversation! HAHAHA! DetlefK Dec 2018 #22
So we would have to press the reset button? guillaumeb Dec 2018 #78
re DetlefK Dec 2018 #84
I disagree. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #86
I said "less groupthink", not "no groupthink". DetlefK Dec 2018 #88
But it is speculation that is refuted by actual history. eom guillaumeb Dec 2018 #90
In actual history... DetlefK Dec 2018 #94
I would not and have never denied the role that religion played. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #95
In that case, yes. marylandblue Dec 2018 #25
Kinda funny how you must point to the most totalitarian examples as your proof of concept Major Nikon Dec 2018 #68
humanity's most oppressive hate group gone? oh no, then it's back to plain old msongs Dec 2018 #11
Where have you gone, Guy? MineralMan Dec 2018 #12
Hey hey hey Voltaire2 Dec 2018 #13
Oooo... MineralMan Dec 2018 #14
I posed some questions. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #21
Waitwaitwait. You just ridiculed me for speculating because you didn't like my answers. DetlefK Dec 2018 #23
Yes, but I answered another post by another person. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #38
Irrelevant. You have two contradicting opinions when talking to two different people. DetlefK Dec 2018 #61
If that's not the epitome of gaslighting Lordquinton Dec 2018 #60
There would be wars Soxfan58 Dec 2018 #26
Indeed. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #39
A world that never had religion would have people very different from ourselves marylandblue Dec 2018 #28
the irrational, the impulsive, matters of emotion and instinct qazplm135 Dec 2018 #34
Imagine the world 20 million years ago - Something like that ck4829 Dec 2018 #29
Very well said. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #40
To the contrary: It disconnects us and it imposes an horizon on us. DetlefK Dec 2018 #62
Considering that religion is Pandoris Dec 2018 #30
Welcome to DU, and this conversation. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #41
Thank you, and sure I would. Pandoris Dec 2018 #46
True. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #49
Religion and faith are not bad and are good. However many in today's churches lancelyons Dec 2018 #31
Do you really think this is a new thing? nt. Mariana Dec 2018 #32
Desire for money and power are both human behaviors. eom guillaumeb Dec 2018 #42
When was Christianity not that way? Voltaire2 Dec 2018 #69
OK Tikki Dec 2018 #54
one less thing to deal with in the morning at work. juxtaposed Dec 2018 #56
Lots of charlatans would have to get real jobs. malchickiwick Dec 2018 #58
The thought crossed my mind that if we consider other species, we might find an example. gtar100 Dec 2018 #59
I agree. guillaumeb Dec 2018 #77
I can't say "Jesus F***ing Christ" without religion Bretton Garcia Dec 2018 #63
Christianity mandated the destruction of the earth Bretton Garcia Dec 2018 #64
I suppose if one is prone to dichotomy they would be satisfied that all the answers are no Major Nikon Dec 2018 #66
A world without religion would be... old as dirt Dec 2021 #96
Agreed. eom guillaumeb Dec 2021 #97
The two videos above... old as dirt Dec 2021 #98
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Imagine a world without f...»Reply #59