Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

zipplewrath

(16,692 posts)
12. An old hypotheses
Thu Jan 31, 2019, 03:27 PM
Jan 2019

This is going way back so it may be obsolete by now, but I've seen suggestions that the universe may have been "banging" and then collapsing back to an original state because the universes were so unstable. The "bang" that created the current universe was more "stable" and allowed massive expansion. It wasn't clear at the time if the universe was going to expand infinitely, or if it would collapse back. I think they've determined now that it's going to expand infinitely.

This of course means nothing "caused" the bang, but it was just a state of the universe at that moment, transitioning between the previous universe and the current one.

Creation Myths Come in Many Forms. [View all] MineralMan Jan 2019 OP
What causes the singularity? zipplewrath Jan 2019 #1
I'm not sure that "causes" is the right word. MineralMan Jan 2019 #3
Well, I'm avoiding semantics zipplewrath Jan 2019 #4
As I understand it, the best current hypothesis is that "nothing" is unstable marylandblue Jan 2019 #9
An old hypotheses zipplewrath Jan 2019 #12
Since discarded by the compelling evidence Voltaire2 Feb 2019 #29
As marylandblue pointed out one idea is that MineralMan Jan 2019 #11
"I don't know" is a perfectly legitimate answer Ron Obvious Jan 2019 #7
Therefore God! Voltaire2 Feb 2019 #30
I don't know. I'm kinda partial to Jesus vomiting up the universe. 3Hotdogs Jan 2019 #2
Are you sure? gtar100 Jan 2019 #5
Along those lines: MarvinGardens Jan 2019 #8
It may be that existence can only "be" because of an observer. gtar100 Jan 2019 #20
Alternatively, mythologies are really psychological stories marylandblue Jan 2019 #10
Myths are imagined explanations of things we cannot experience. MineralMan Jan 2019 #15
But, time may not exist except within the physical universe. MineralMan Jan 2019 #13
Is there any evidence edhopper Jan 2019 #16
Good question. MineralMan Jan 2019 #17
That is not a question gtar100 Jan 2019 #18
I am a naturalist edhopper Jan 2019 #19
Actually it literally is. Voltaire2 Feb 2019 #28
Step on a crack! TwistOneUp Jan 2019 #6
Yes. Something like that. MineralMan Jan 2019 #14
I can't be 100% sure that we don't live in a simulated reality... MarvinGardens Jan 2019 #21
Oh, I think pretty much everyone has flirted with that idea MineralMan Feb 2019 #22
Sometimes a deity... NeoGreen Feb 2019 #23
Yes. I remember that. MineralMan Feb 2019 #24
No worries... NeoGreen Feb 2019 #25
For years in Tulsa TlalocW Feb 2019 #26
What a great idea! MineralMan Feb 2019 #27
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Creation Myths Come in Ma...»Reply #12