Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
What is the role of inspiration in the Bible? [View all]
Nahmanides was a Spanish Talmudist, Kabbalist and biblical commentator (1194-1270), known, after the initial letters of his name, as Ramban (Rabbi Moshe ben Nahman).
Nahmanides said, speaking of creation:
At the briefest instant following creation all the matter of the universe was concentrated in a very small place, no larger than a grain of mustard. The matter at this time was so thin, so intangible, that it did not have real substance. It did have, however, a potential to gain substance and form and to become tangible matter. From the initial concentration of this intangible substance in its minute location, the substance expanded, expanding the universe as it did so. As the expansion progressed, a change in the substance occurred. This initially thin noncorporeal substance took on the tangible aspects of matter as we know it. From this initial act of creation, from this ethereally thin pseudosubstance, everything that has existed, or will ever exist, was, is, and will be formed.
Metaphoric language, but remarkably like the 20th century Big Bang hypothesis from a 12th century Rabbi.
According to Stephen Hawking, this original, primordial speck is called a singularity, with infinite energy pulling in upon itself, not allowing any energy to escape. This was the ultimate black hole. This was considered a monumental discovery, but something that we have known, although not totally understood, from Torah literature for thousands of years!
One thing Hawking does not explain is how the Big Bang was possible. If there is an infinite amount of energy holding the singularity together, from whence is the even greater energy to pull it apart?!
He indeed does say that until after the point of the Big Bang, all science and mathematics breaks down, and time and science have their beginnings only after the Big Bang. Our answer to all this is that the Creator, who was the architect of the very concept of infinity, had the energy beyond infinity to bring about the Big Bang.
As science progresses, we see much more clearly how the physical world and the spiritual world of Torah are one.
https://www.aish.com/atr/Creation-and-The-Big-Bang.html
So was Nahmanides' idea the product of insight, or inspiration?
In the creation story of Genesis, we are told that Adam and Eve were the first 2 humans. And read literally, it is inconsistent with science.
But if the names Adam and Eve translate into earth and life. we have life coming from the earth.
We are told that God took 1 rib from Adam and created Eve, thus Adam was missing a rib. Clearly men and women have the same number of ribs, and even Bronze Age humans knew that, so what is the underlying meaning?
One possibility:
Men are XY, and women are XX. The Y has one less "rib", or leg, than does the X.
So is this insight, or inspiration?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
82 replies, 7789 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What's additionally upsetting is by doing this, guillaumeb is reinforcing sexist stereotypes...
trotsky
Mar 2019
#7
What constitutes evidence in the absence of knowledge of the Creator's nature?
guillaumeb
Mar 2019
#58
It's not a misframe. The story actually justifies patriarchical oppression
marylandblue
Mar 2019
#50
The ancient Indians spoke of the Unity of Creation thousands of years before. Their teachings
c-rational
Mar 2019
#60
I would never say that the Creator can only be found in the wrods of the Bible.
guillaumeb
Mar 2019
#68
As you well know, english speakers generally use very few verb forms when speaking.
guillaumeb
Mar 2019
#77