Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Religion

(970 posts)

17. Probably that's correct

Sat Apr 20, 2019, 04:46 PM

Apr 2019

But there are some things that seem far, far, far more likely than others. Those far more likely things, we could call "facts "

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Scientists establish a link between religious fundamentalism and brain damage [View all] Voltaire2 Apr 2019 OP

That's a very interesting idea. MineralMan Apr 2019 #1

I love Science. Bretton Garcia Apr 2019 #2

"Theories" come and go. Bretton Garcia Apr 2019 #4

Einstein is a special case, still unsettled. Bretton Garcia Apr 2019 #9

I wouldn't go so far as to say typically Major Nikon Apr 2019 #10

I see them working together Bretton Garcia Apr 2019 #11

Scientific theories generally aren't even intended to be factual Major Nikon Apr 2019 #12

Well, there are Newton's Laws of Motion MineralMan Apr 2019 #13

So thanks everyone for helping me clarify things in my mind. Bretton Garcia Apr 2019 #14

There is only patterns of matter and energy in the Universe uriel1972 Apr 2019 #16

ummm absolute facts can't be determined... uriel1972 Apr 2019 #15

Probably that's correct Bretton Garcia Apr 2019 #17

Yes, that's the joy of probabilities... uriel1972 Apr 2019 #18

For humor's sake... NeoGreen Apr 2019 #6

Excellent! . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2019 #7

To confirm or disconfirm confirmation bias existed? Bretton Garcia Apr 2019 #8