Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Bradshaw3

(7,959 posts)
9. It said contemporaneous and your source is not legitimate
Mon Apr 22, 2019, 03:09 PM
Apr 2019

None of those you mention wrote about a Jesus during the time. They also have other credential problems, especially Josephus who is usually listed first as a historical source. Josephus wrote later than the time period and what we have from him regarding Jesus are translations from Christian monks. Just a few mentions there, odd considering all the mircales; most think the monks inserted those few references.

I can see how one family escaped the record keeping at that time packman Apr 2019 #1
Yeah. You'd think that the drowning of the Egyptian army MineralMan Apr 2019 #2
Embarrassments weren't recorded. Igel Apr 2019 #7
Not only did they leave Egypt without any written record... Major Nikon Apr 2019 #16
An explanation that I have heard is The Genealogist Apr 2019 #37
Same reason there's no contemporaneous accounts of Brian McGillicuddy of Pigsknuckle, Arksansas. Act_of_Reparation Apr 2019 #3
Not even a baptismal certificate or family bible entry? MineralMan Apr 2019 #4
Annoying is probably the best guess. Act_of_Reparation Apr 2019 #6
What do you mean? There are several Clash City Rocker Apr 2019 #5
Contemporaneous sources. Act_of_Reparation Apr 2019 #8
It said contemporaneous and your source is not legitimate Bradshaw3 Apr 2019 #9
Not one of those is contemporaneous. MineralMan Apr 2019 #12
Only one of those is considered to be of Voltaire2 Apr 2019 #17
Because the Devil didn't want you to know of his great achievements. 3Hotdogs Apr 2019 #10
You do have to remember that Jerusalem was destroyed exboyfil Apr 2019 #11
Oral tradition is not verifiable. MineralMan Apr 2019 #13
For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again Cartoonist Apr 2019 #14
Not a lot about Herod Antipas. Igel Apr 2019 #15
Not really a convincing scenario, for either MineralMan Apr 2019 #18
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. kwassa Apr 2019 #21
He also said edhopper Apr 2019 #22
Absence of evidence is evidence of nothing. MineralMan Apr 2019 #23
Although abscence of evidence of something where... uriel1972 Apr 2019 #24
Absence of evidence is proof of nothing else. kwassa Apr 2019 #25
Actually absense of evidence can be evidence of absense edhopper Apr 2019 #30
Um Judea was an important trade area... uriel1972 Apr 2019 #39
Perhaps not all cheap coins locally-minted under Roman authority had faces struggle4progress Apr 2019 #40
Pizza! Pizza! Pandoris Apr 2019 #19
It would mean that Cleopatra was Mary. Pandoris Apr 2019 #20
Nothin' from nothin' leaves nothin' JenniferJuniper Apr 2019 #26
Jesus is as real as Mary being a virgin at the time of his birth n/t itsrobert Apr 2019 #27
Also curious lordsummerisle Apr 2019 #28
Herods slaughter of the innocents Buzz cook Apr 2019 #29
Funny how testy some Christians get when this comes up. trotsky Apr 2019 #31
The truth has very sharp teeth and bites HARD. MineralMan Apr 2019 #32
I just find it interesting when you press for facts, you're told that it's only faith that matters. trotsky Apr 2019 #33
Grasping at straws, I think that's called. MineralMan Apr 2019 #34
Even if they find evidence, it usually doesn't prove much. Mariana Apr 2019 #35
But they haven't found any evidence of Jesus, or his Dad, either. MineralMan Apr 2019 #36
When told that... uriel1972 Apr 2019 #38
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Religion»Why Are There No Contempo...»Reply #9